NOTE ONE TIME CHANGE:
Monday October 17 2016
Update on latest trip to Israel
The Canadian Broadcasting Service in 2012 concluded that Trento “considers himself a soldier battling the Muslim menace in the U.S.” and that his group “opposes any project to build new mosques or expand existing ones.” Trento believes eighty percent of the mosques in the United States are teaching “sedition.” Trento’s biography on the United West website identifies him as “one of the leading academic activists in the United States.” Trento is also listed as one of the “associates” on the Center for Security Policy’s “Sharia: the Threat to America,” report.In text accompanying a video distributed on October 12, 2014, Trento asserts that, “mosques are NOT primarily ‘houses of worship’ but more so, bases of operation to launch a ‘Cultural Jihad’ against America!”
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS
Oct. 18, 2016 – HREC/THP Trump -Pence flag wave Sparta Rd and U.S 27 South 4-6 PM
I go, how about some members showing up also, we can leave at 5-5:30 but make a showing
Oct. 25, 2016 – Brandon Ball (Dem)/Candio Garcia (Write in)/Mike Rowan (NPA) /Paul Blackman (Rep)/Bobby Bean (Write in) – Candidates for Highlands County Sheriff
Nov. 1, 2016 – Billy Vaughn CVA – Last Phone back before election – Would like all who cans help to pitch in.
Nov. 1, 2016 – Ron McMahon – Candidate County Commission District 5 (Incumbent Gregg Harris)
Nov. 8, 2016 – Election Day – NO TEA PARTY MEETING
Nov. 15, 2016 – KrisAnn Hall – Constitutional Lawyer, Author, Speaker.
Nov. 22, 2016 – Dan Peterson, “Saving the Everglades”
Dec 13, 2016 – Kevin Blake – CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS AND PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (Sheriff Mack) – Power Point
October 19, 2016
topics to be chosen by the moderator.
Moderator: CHris Wallace FOX NEWS
10 AM – 12 PM
TRUMP FLAG WAVE
Bring Trump/Pence signs, Deplorables signs,
Hillary Deplorables, (Ladies & Gentlemen)
What will it take to get YOU to participate in our…..
Highlands County REC/Highlands Tea Party
TRUMP FLAG/SIGN WAVE
Your local Republican Headquarters will also be used as a headquarters for all Republican candidates, from national to local, running on the November 8, 2016 ballot. You may obtain candidate or voting information from Headquarters on any of these candidates that have provided items to us for distribution.
THE PUBLIC IS MORE THAN WELCOME TO
ATTEND OUR MEETINGS
No Dues or Fee’s Only donations if you choose.
WE ASK THAT ALL GUEST SPEAKERS BE TREATED PROPERLY
There is NO EXCUSE for NO RESPECT
THIS IS GOING TO BE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTIONS IN OUR LIFETIME,
Either we set this Great Nation on a different path for our children and grandchildren, or we continue down the path of socialism, mayhem, a divided nation, cop killings, open borders, no national sovereignty, and Muslim refugees who are unvetted by the thousands bringing with them diseases we have not seen in this country in decades, and ISIS Jihadist Killers to set up and carry out their reign of terror on American soil.
YOU ALREADY KNOW WHAT HILLARY AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE
OFFERING AMERICA; A CONTINUED PATH TO TOTAL SOCIALISM.
DO DEMOCRATS REALLY WANT THAT CHOICE?
THE CHOICE IS YOURS, WHICH WILL IT BE:
FREEDOM UNDER THE REPUBLICAN AGENDA,
SOCIALISM UNDER THE PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC AGENDA?
By Judi McLeod —— Bio and Archives October 20, 2016
Millions got to see it with their very own eyes during last night’s last presidential debate: Hillary Clinton laughing at the prospect of ISIS hurling gays to their deaths off of high buildings.
As sure as the written work of her late mentor Saul Alinsky was dedicated to Lucifer, as certain as the sun setting over a not so long ago noble America, it happened.
There was no mistaking it. No room for alibis or excuses. It really happened. Somewhat surrealistically, Fox News’ monitor Chris Wallace, patently ignored her laugh, proving that as far as these lib-left media debate monitors are concerned, the show must go on.
When Donald J. Trump brought up how her Middle East donors throw gays off of buildings to their death, The Woman Who Would Be President, flashed the most evil of smiles ever seen before outright laughing.
If you missed it last night, and have the stomach for it today, here is the clip.
The real Hillary stepped out of Satan’s shadows last night, showing the televised world just what America is up against.
Convinced her presidency is in the bag; convinced the media has firmly slammed the door shut against any and all opponents, she couldn’t control her smiles and laughs anymore than she could keep the fly from landing on her face at the October 9th presidential debate.
Hillary Clinton who laughed all the way to the bank; who laughed all the way through escaping justice for the 33,000 deleted emails that compromised the security of her own country; who laughed all the way through criticism of her pay-to-play “charitable” foundation that left the poverty-stricken people of Haiti in the lurch, is laughing her way back into the kind of power that will break the back of America.
Reaction to the most evil smile ever seen on national television and her cackling laughter over how ISIS disposes of gays, was swift.:
“Is that something to LAUGH about, Hillary?
GAY PEOPLE BEING HURLED OFF BUILDINGS IS FUNNY?
“She’s a sick, sick woman.” (Truthfeed)
Clinton was no doubt buoyed by an email her mentor President Barack Obama sent out within hours of the last presidential debate.
It stinks to high heaven that Obama—a man who to the present day still hides all information about what must be a shady past—gets to use the power of the presidential office to criticize a private citizen running for president.
Obama glommed onto the opportunity of the last presidential debate to raise money for his protégé Hillary Clinton, using the occasion to call her Republican opponent Donald Trump “simply unfit” for the office.
“Will you chip in $3 or more before midnight,” he asked in carny barker fashion in an email sent out to all.
Weighing in on the presidential debate before it even got underway, he pontificated from the Ivory Tower known as the White House:
“One candidate is simply unfit and unprepared for the office. He likes to talk tough, but he’s spent most of the last week refusing to take responsibility for his actions and complaining to the refs.
“The other is the most qualified person to run for the presidency.
“I’m all in to elect my friend Hillary Clinton. She needs your help right now, too.
“Tonight is the final debate of this campaign. Every supporter who steps up before then joins the official record of Final Debate Donors, the folks standing shoulder to shoulder with Hillary when it matters most.
“Hillary’s one of the smartest, toughest, best-prepared, most experienced people ever to run for this job. As First Lady, as a U.S. Senator, and as my Secretary of State, she’s spent every day fighting for justice, equality, and the belief that everybody deserves a fair shake. She never ever quits.
“That’s who she is.”
Everybody deserves a “fair shake” in Hillary’s book other than babies in the womb and gays.
“This debate isn’t just about who wins on November 8th. It’s a showdown between the politics of fear and blame and the hope and optimism that make America the greatest nation on Earth.”
Obama has spent the last eight years of his life globe-trotting the world to put America down.
Now that his handpicked replacement is running to give him an unearned third term in office, he FINALLY admits that—only because of the false “hope” and “optimism” of himself and Hillary Clinton America is “the greatest nation on earth”.
Taking advantage of his presidential office stinks more than the foul-smelling human waste dumped onto the street and down a storm drain by the Clinton ‘Forward Together’ campaign bus in Lawrenceville, Georgia on Tuesday.
The stench emanating from Clinton and Obama is getting closer every day.
America, brace yourself.
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.
EVEN FOX NEWS HAS JOINED THE LEFT – Headline could have read: Hillary jeered over her comments about Trump
Fox News is starting to show it true colors, Not only was Trumped Jeered or booed for a couple of comments about HIllary, Hillary had the same results from some of her comments about trump, either booing. jeered or absolute silence after her comments. Megan Kelly is the worst on FOX NEWS when it come to hating Trump, although she tries to hit hide it with her “Cute” facial expressions, hand motions, or whisper talk.
One can see why she slipped from Number 1 to Number 3.
Trump jeered over personal attacks against Clinton at charity dinner
Republican nominee Donald Trump was jeered by attendees at a New York white-tie charity dinner Thursday night after his speech crossed from roast-style jokes into personal attacks on his opponent, Hillary Clinton. The first outburst from members of the audience at the annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner came when Trump said that Clinton was “so corrupt she got kicked off the Watergate Commission.”
The jeers continued when Trump referenced the Clinton campaign emails leaked by Wikileaks and claimed that the former secretary of state was “pretending not to hate Catholics,” an apparent reference to 2011 emails from a current Clinton campaign spokeswoman that mocked Catholics and evangelical Christians.
Some members of the audience appeared to be shouting at Timothy Cardinal Dolan, who was sitting between the candidates, and asking him to take the microphone from Trump, who quickly pivoted to remembrances of attending the event with his father. Moments earlier, Trump had gotten one of the biggest cheers of the night when he joked about his wife Melania’s speech at the Republican National Convention, which was found to have been partially plagiarized from an address by first lady Michelle Obama. “Michelle Obama gives a speech and everyone loves it,” Trump said. “My wife Melania gives the exact same speech and people get on her case and I don’t get it. I don’t know why.”
As Melania Trump rose to acknowledge the applause, her husband remarked, “I’m in trouble when I go home tonight. She didn’t know about that one.”
Some of Trump’s attack lines showed a sense of humor. Clinton was the first one to laugh when Trump joked that she had bumped into him earlier in the night “and she very simply said `Pardon me”‘ — an unsubtle reference to the Republican nominee’s frequent declarations that his opponent should go to jail.
Clinton, meanwhile, joked that she had taken a break from her “usual nap schedule” to attend and suggested that the audience should be pleased she’s not charging her usual fee for speaking in front of potential donors. But she also got in some digs at Trump, a few of which drew scattered jeers. Clinton said she understood why Trump was leery of teleprompters because they can be difficult to follow and “I’m sure it’s even harder when you’re translating from the original Russian.”
Clinton repeatedly referenced Trump’s most controversial moments from the three presidential debates. She joked that if Trump didn’t like what she was saying, then he could shout ‘wrong.”‘ She added that she was surprised Trump let her go second because “I didn’t think he’d be OK with a peaceful transition of power.” And she said Trump “looks at the Statue of Liberty and sees a four. Maybe a `5’ if she loses the torch and tablet and changes her hair.”
She even took a shot at Trump’s running mate, saying that “after listening to your speech, I will also look forward to listening to Mike Pence deny that you ever said it.” FOXNEWS – Read ON>>>>>>
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
Rasmussen: Trump Tied With Clinton
Wednesday, 19 Oct 2016 10:13 AM
With less than three weeks to go for Election Day, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are tied in the latest Rasmussen Reports poll released Wednesday.
The breakdown of the survey’s results find that almost one-in-10 voters are still looking beyond the top four candidates:
Clinton: 42 percent;
Trump: 42 percent;
Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson: 7 percent;
Green Party candidate Jill Stein: 1 percent;
Some other candidate: 3 percent;
Undecided: 6 percent.
Clinton had a broad 18-point lead over Trump among women voters, the survey showed. It further revealed that the former first lady was ahead of the Republican nominee among women of all age groups. Tuesday’s polls saw Clinton and Trump almost neck-and-neck — 42 percent to 41 percent.
A sizeable 84 percent of respondents are sure about how they will vote, with both candidates getting equal preference (47 percent).
However, among voters who are likely to change their minds:
Clinton: 35 percent;
Trump: 34 percent;
Johnson: 27 percent;
Stein: 4 percent.
Both Clinton and Trump have been battling controversies. While Trump’s support took a slight plunge after a 2005 video tape of the billionaire businessman surfaced of him making lewd comments about women, Clinton too is in the limelight over email revelations from WikiLeaks.
Both the candidates have their third and final presidential debate Wednesday in Las Vegas. The survey which was conducted between Oct. 16 and 18 interviewed 1,500 Likely Voters. The margin of sampling error was +/- 2.5 percentage points.
Trump sparks furor at final debate
Donald Trump’s refusal to say that he will accept the presidential election’s outcome overshadowed all else during his third debate with Hillary Clinton, in Las Vegas on Wednesday evening.
Virtually no one in the political world argued that the GOP nominee would benefit from the move.
Trump’s remarks — he told moderator Chris Wallace, “I will look at it at the time” and “I will keep you in suspense” — stood in sharp contrast to recent comments from his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, and even his daughter Ivanka.
His stance also sent shockwaves through the Republican Party, where criticism of Trump was already running high.
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) quickly tweeted that Trump’s position was “beyond the pale.” Sen.Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) released a statement asserting that Trump was “doing the party and our country a great disservice by continuing to suggest the outcome of this election is out of his hands and ‘rigged’ against him.”
Both Flake and Graham are longtime Trump critics.
The reaction among GOP strategists was even more pointed. Nicolle Wallace, who worked for President George W. Bush and 2008 GOP nominee John McCain, described Trump’s words as “a disqualifying statement” on NBC News.
Meanwhile, Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway tried to find an escape route from the position her candidate had enunciated, telling CNN moments after the debate ended that “Donald Trump will accept the results of the election because he will win the election.”
Trump’s stance erased any final doubt that he would remain the same candidate he has always been — one who stands defiantly outside the parameters of normal political discourse.
The approach won him the GOP nomination against all odds, as Republican voters rallied to his attacks on political correctness and illegal immigration, as well as his flamboyant verbal assaults on his rivals.
On Wednesday evening, he reiterated his plan to build a wall along the U.S-Mexico border, promised to deport “some bad hombres” and assailed Clinton as “such a nasty woman.” THE HILL – – Read On >>>>>
It’s finally over.
The third and final presidential debate between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton lived up to expectations, and voters have a lot more information to help them decide of who they will vote in as president on November 8.
Both Trump and Clinton were on there best game, sounding very prepared and in many cases, answering questions very substantively.
Yes, Donald Trump came prepared even though he did manage to veer off course a bit on a couple of his answers, but that’s ok, he’s “The Donald.”
There were three definitive instances during the debate that stood out above the rest.
The first was Trump refusing to say if he would in fact support election night results. Trump has been saying that the election was “rigged” in favor of Clinton, and that he would let Americans know of his decision when the time came.
On the issue of immigration, Hillary Clinton might have been caught in a big lie. Clinton supports a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, this we all know.
During the debate, Clinton stated that within the first one hundred days of her administration, she would push for comprehensive immigration reform that would include a pathway for those here in the country illegally.
Clinton also denied being for all-out amnesty for illegals, and open borders.
That is when Trump pounced, reminding her that she once stated she was for open borders. Debate moderator, Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace reminded Clinton that during a speech she gave in 2013, where she was paid a $250,0000 speaking fee by Brazilian bank Banco Itau, she had expressed her support for “open borders.”
Here is her complete statement:
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”
She says she support open borders, but what exactly did she mean?
This energy statement could have been cover for opining her real views on immigration reform, but again, this up for interpretation.
Regardless, most Americans will take Clinton’s statement as full-on support for open borders as it pertains to immigration.
Then came the issue of the Clinton Foundation and Trump’s potty mouth.
Clinton attacked Trump on the 2005 video, and Trump defended himself, saying that he never attacked a woman, stating that he didn’t’ even apologize to his wife because he did nothing wrong.
Trump then laid into Clinton hard, suggesting that she return all the money the Clinton Foundation took in from Sharia-nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
“It is a criminal enterprise… “Saudi Arabia giving $25 million, Qatar, all of these countries, you check about women and women’s race — these are people that push gays off buildings. They kill women and treat women horribly, and yet you take their money.”
“So I would like to ask you right now…Why don’t you give back the money that you have taken from certain countries that treat certain groups of people so horribly? Why don’t you give back the money? I think it would be a great gesture, because she takes a tremendous amount of money ”
Trump sealed his argument buy stating that the Clinton Foundation was “a disgrace.”
“And you know it, and they know it, and everybody knows it.”
With less than three weeks left until a new president is elected, Clinton leads Trump in just about every poll, but not by much.
Did Trump swing enough undecided voters from voting for Clinton? Or, did Hillary Clinton hold her ground enough to get her over the finish line?
Here’s Who Won The Debate, According To The Internet
Donald Trump won the third and final presidential debate — or at least that’s what you’d think if you were reading the Internet Wednesday night.
As the two candidates went head to head for 90 minutes onstage at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, it was clear that the Republican nominee had won the Internet over.
In a poll run on the Drudge Report near the end of the debate, 76 percent of voters believed that Trump defeated Clinton handily, while 24 percent thought she had won.
It’s worth noting that voters didn’t seem to think Trump performed as well as he did in St. Louis, when he garnered 92 percent of the Drudge poll.
The pollster Frank Luntz tweeted halfway through the debate to say that 12 members of his focus group thought Trump had won while only nine thought Clinton did
Halfway through, who is winning the debate?
• 12 say Trump
• 9 say Clinton
• 5 say it’s tied#Debate
In the end, 14 members of the group declared Trump the winner, Luntz noted.
Trump also dominated the conversation on social media, according to numbers released by Facebook Wednesday night. He was the topic of 56 percent of the conversation on Facebook during the debate while Clinton was at 44 percent.
Even those watching at home agreed that Trump won the final face off between him and Clinton.
BREAKING: Media Refuses To Report On Hillary’s Election “Fixer”
A hack of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations uncovered documents showing that the socialist billionaire’s used his power and influence to try to sway elections in Europe and Israel. “A memo called the ‘List of European Elections 2014 Projects’ details the elaborate efforts of Soros’ well-funded global network to manipulate election outcomes in Europe,” Investor’s Business Daily reported, adding that the memo contained a total of 90 such projects.
Other memos obtained by the hacker group DC Leaks, which published the documents earlier this month, revealed that Soros also spent $4 million in 2015 to run campaigns in Israel against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who at the time was running for re-election. The question now is this: Has Soros been attempting to do the same thing here on behalf of Democrat presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton?
The evidence suggested he has. For one thing, the relationship between Clinton and Soros runs so deep that he was reportedly able to influence State Department policy in Albania. Moreover, the socialist billionaire has donated an estimated $9 million to Clinton-supporting super PACs. Add to this the fact that Soros proposed paying the Center for American Politics $200,000 to smear top conservative activists, donated $650,000 to assist the Black Lives Matter movement and pressured the Obama administration into increasing the number of Syrian refugees it intended to import.
The guy is a bonafide menace to politics and transparency, which raises another question, courtesy American Thinker founder Thomas Lifson: “Soros got the U.S. and other accomplices to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign state (and has been caught doing the same here) … How is this not huge news?” In other words, why has the mainstream media so reticent in the face of this earth-shattering revelation?
Because Soros is a radical leftist, and that apparently puts him above and beyond ethics and the law.
NEW YORK — Speaking publicly for the first time in a Breitbart News video exclusive interview, a former local television news reporter from Arkansas claims she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on three separate occasions in 1980.
Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax.
After these alleged sexual assaults, Millwee claims, Clinton showed up at her apartment and knocked on her door for several minutes while trying to talk his way inside. She says that Clinton departed after she purportedly refused to respond.
WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW:
Millwee says she was thinking about coming out publicly around 1998, when the Monica Lewinsky scandal began to dominate the national conversation. But at the time, she says she decided to remain quiet, in part fearing for her children after watching the way other Clinton sex accusers were treated by the Clintons and the news media.
Three of Millwee’s friends told Breitbart News that she told them in the late 1990’s that Clinton sexually assaulted her while she was a reporter and that the future president allegedly knocked on her apartment door.
Millwee claims the assaults took place in a small, isolated editing room at her now defunct station, KLMN-TV, which covered the Fort Smith/Fayetteville markets. At the time Millwee reported under the assumed name Leslie Derrick.
As part of her job, Millwee says that she covered the so-called Cuban Refugee Crisis, which took place in 1980 when about 125,000 Cubans fled their homeland in boats and were allowed into the U.S. By May 1980, about 20,000 refugees were housed at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas’s military base, creating security and law enforcement problems for then Governor Clinton with refugees rioting and escaping the compound.
Millwee says she interviewed Clinton about 20 times at various public events and at Fort Chaffee, and saw him inside the KLMN station.
Wikileaks Reveals Hillary’s Top 13 Acts of Treason against the U.S.
Here is a nice list of 13 actions by Hillary Clinton that could be considered treasonous. From ‘donations’ to ‘birthday gifts’ to the good old pay-to-play influence pedaling, here are the things we know about. Read about the Iran nuclear deal and her public and private positions on issues. Don’t call me surely, but there has to be a better candidate running.
As written by iPatriot:
The last nine days has revealed the inner workings of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and mind – what’s been found hasn’t been pretty or American. Instead what has been seen through the Wikileaks revelations has been incredible details of illegalities, immorality, and treason against the American people. It’s difficult to digest all of the details and with that in mind, through the first 8 days of Wikileaks revelations, the following are 13 of the most relevant emails from Hillary Clinton which show acts of treason.
13 Acts of Treason against the Citizens of the United States
Qatar gifts Bill Clinton $1,000,000 for his birthday:
Saudi Sheikh won’t donate money to Clinton Foundation unless he receives a phone call from Bill Clinton. Staff responds: Bill won’t do it “unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check”:
Iran Deal (which Hillary negotiated and defends) “condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf”. John Podesta responds with “Yup”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/727#efmAAGAAJABQAEL
Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta owned 75,000 shares in Putin-connected energy company: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635#efmAFyAGUAWLAYP
Transcripts from Hillary Clinton’s lucrative closed-door paid speeches delivered to elite financial firms and other special interests groups (which she has refused and failed to disclose to the public after much demand) have finally surfaced: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See Attachment)
Clinton staff conspiring to stage ‘leaking’ of favorable excerpts from wall street speech, in efforts to calm down the public while leaving out more damaging parts: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8086#efmAYqAgR
Leaked private speech, Clinton: “You Need Both A Public And A Private Position” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmAaQAdiFjUFkd
Leaked private speech, Clinton: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFjUFkd
Leaked private speech transcript shows Clinton’s warm ties to Wall Street’s most powerful figures: Clinton: “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives” The pressure on officials to sell or divest assets in order to serve, she added, had become “very onerous and unnecessary”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmDEMDKk
Leaked private speech to Goldman Sachs, Clinton: “Wall Street was only accountable for the financial crisis for political reasons. The blame placed on the United States banking system for the crisis “could have been avoided in terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmA2YA5Q
Leaked private speech, Clinton: US will “ring China with missile defense” and has right to rename Pacific Ocean the “American Sea”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 (See attachment)
Hillary Clinton flipped her public position on TPP after her team discussed how she would be “eaten alive” by Labor: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8452#efmAH1APRA0NA5c
Clinton speechwriter: “We are trying to find a good way to leak her opposition to the pipeline without her having to actually say it”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3855#efmAAGADH
NOTICE: some foul language in Emails.
Latest Email Leaks: Lynch Tied to Soros, Reporters Fund Clinton and Obama Clamps Down on Julian Assange!
We’re going to quickly recap the incredible goings-on of the last two days:
International government’s clamp down on Julian Assange
Loretta Lynch beholden to George Soros
Journalists funding the Clinton campaign
Clinton Team pushed the FBI to change email classifications
Sunday evening into Monday morning the online world exploded in a flurry of worry that the world governments were about to slam down upon WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Instead, what actually happened was that someone, reportedly a “state actor” (think the CIA, NSA or one of their international equivalents) had shut down Mr. Assange’s Internet access in London’s Ecuadorian Embassy.
The first question that should have reverberated from free citizens around the world was… why had Assange’s Internet been cut? While many world governments have attacked Mr. Assange, none have disproven any of the assertions he’s made or the leaks that he’s released. Which means that their decision to cut his Internet access seems to be a wholly selfish decision meant to keep the public ignorant to their government’s malfeasance.
Sadly for the corrupt world governments while Julian Assange’s Internet was cut, it did not mean WikiLeaks would stop releasing proof of government corruption.
One inflammatory release showed that Attorney General Loretta Lynch was apparently beholden to George Soros.
Why is AG Lynch having lunch with the Democrat Party’s biggest financial supporter, and why is the Clinton team coordinating between Lynch and the party fundraisers? Does no one else see the conflict of interest here? Lynch is being used as a tool to fundraise for the party even as she’s supposed to be the top law enforcement officer for every American… not just the Democrat ones.
A new report from the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) found that the vast majority of political contributions to the presidential campaigns went to (wait for it) — the Clinton campaign for the White House. The CPI found that 96% of donations from the media went to Hillary Clinton – about $382K, compared to just $14K to the Trump campaign.
This latest report dovetailed nicely with this leak, proving that yet another so-called “journalist” was nothing more than a political hack doing the left’s bidding. In fact, the journalist actually calls himself a “hack”!
Finally, more evidence that the Clinton team tried to force the FBI to break the law in an effort to protect their candidate. An uncovered email found State Department Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy pushing the FBI to change the classification on Clinton’s email before promising that the document would “never be seen again,” and that there would bequid pro quo for the FBI.
Documents published Monday morning confirm the account. Notes from an interview with an unnamed FBI official reveal the State Department Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy tried to horse-trade with the FBI, offering additional slots for the bureau overseas if they would de-classify a particular email marked “SECRET.”
According to the documents, an unnamed individual said he was “pressured” to “change the classified email to unclassified.”
“[Redacted] indicated he had been contacted by PATRICK KENNEDY, Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo,’” the 302 states. “[Redacted] advised that in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.”
At a subsequent meeting at the State Department regarding the classification review of Clinton’s materials where Kennedy presided, someone asked whether any of the emails in question were classified.
“Making eye contact with [redacted] KENNEDY remarked, ‘Well, we’ll see,’” the document says. The official, according to one account, was “attempting to influence the FBI to change its markings.”
Kennedy allegedly asked at that point who else he could speak with and was referred to Michael Steinbach, then a top official with the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division. Kennedy “continued to pressure the FBI to change the classified markings on the email to unclassified,” the document says. “STEINBACH refused to do so.”
In any other election year, against any other candidate, Hillary Clinton’s hopes for the White House would be completely crushed at this point… but sadly, that just doesn’t seem to be the case. With the media’s help, the Democrats seem on the verge of escaping a catastrophic collapse.
IF THIS DOESN’T GET YOU MAD, WHAT WILL? DID YOU EVER GET PAID $160,000 A YEAR FOR TAKING CARE OF YOUR GRANDCHILDREN?
The Obamas are the worst First Family in American history.
Barack Obama has admitted to doing drugs with his “Choom Gang” and is the worst President of all time. Michelle spends all her time ruining our kids’ school lunches and spending millions on vacations with her daughters. And the Obama kids are an embarrassment – going to drinking parties, and maybe even doing drugs in public.
They are shameful swindlers, wasting your tax dollars on their comfort and profligacy.
But now, a story is going viral that claims the most outrageous waste of taxpayer money by the Obama family.
First Grandma Marian Robinson, 79, will receive a lifetime 160K government pension when she leaves the White House next year, according to congressional budget statements. According to documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Mrs. Robinson earned the lifetime pension for “services rendered as full-time/in-home caregiver” for granddaughters Malia, 18, and Sasha, 15, during President Obama’s two terms in office.
Michelle Obama’s mom got to live like a queen in the White House, but they are going to pay her $160,000 every year for the rest of her life for babysitting her own granddaughters? This is the kind of graft and corruption that happens in places like Iraq and North Korea. Michelle Obama’s mom didn’t earn a pension that’s THREE TIMES bigger than the average American family’s income.
It seems that just like Barack, the rest of the Obama’s never had real jobs, and instead of live high on the hog off the backs of regular taxpaying Americans.
The NFL started the season believing that their fans’ anger over players protesting the national anthem would quickly be forgotten. But much like the Cleveland Browns’ playoff hopes, those notions were quickly dashed. Four weeks into the season and the NFL is getting hit where it hurts most.
This season, network viewership is down about 10% from last season, according to Nielsen data, with steeper declines for prime-time games on Sunday, Monday and Thursday,” The Wall Street Journal reports. “The drop has caught advertisers and rights holders off guard and left them scrambling to find a cause.” Why are viewers refusing to tune in?
Because of Colin Kaepernick and the effort by liberals to politicize the games.
“A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that nearly one-third (32%) of American Adults say they are less likely to watch an NFL game because of the growing number of Black Lives Matter protests by players on the field,” the polling firm reports. That’s significant. The NFL had collected $7.3 billion in revenue in 2014. That was a 21 percent increase over the previous year. The NFL was still 32 teams playing in 70,000-100,000 seat stadiums. And the one thing that has accounted for the massive increase in NFL value and revenues?
In 2014 the NFL signed a new nine-year TV contract with Fox, NBC and CBS. Along with their deal with ESPN, network broadcasts of games pay the league a stunning $5 billion a year. DirecTV has a separate deal paying the NFL $1.25 billion a year. The NFL inked the deal based on projections that TV viewership would continue to grow. So that has the league in panic mode over this seasons 10 percent plunge in ratings.
At $6.25 billion a year, just a five percent loss in the value of its TV contracts adds up to $312,500,000 a year. If the NFL had to sign another nine-year contract with only a five percent drop in value, the league would lose a total over $2.8 billion. A $2.8 billion loss. All due to just a five percent dip.
TV ratings are currently down 10 percent. So you can imagine how the NFL is panicking.
With more fans getting rid of cable and choosing to view clips of games on websites instead of sitting through a three-hour broadcast, the last thing the NFL can afford to do is alienate the fans who actually make the lucrative TV contracts possible. If ratings continue to decline and the NFL is forced to re-balance its books, they may want to start by cutting Kaepernick and putting an end to activists using the massively profitable company to make political statements.
VIDEO: 4 Million Dead People & Ineligible
Voters Are Registered To Vote
In an interview on “Fox and Friends” Tuesday morning, elections attorney J. Christian Adams said dead people are voting and the Obama administration isn’t doing anything about it – because they like it the way it is.
When asked why nothing is being done, Adams responded, “Well, they must like who they’re voting for.” He said there are 4 MILLION ineligible and dead voters on American voter rolls, and the Obama administration is not prosecuting voter fraud.
Adams said he has filed six suits in just the past year over voter corruption and dead people on the voter rolls, including Philadelphia and Broward County, Florida. He said they found one case in Texas where a person who died in 1944 was still a registered voter.
Adams is a former voting Section Attorney with the Justice Department, and once went after Hillary Clinton’s brother, Hugh Rodham, for violating bar regulations in 2001. In 2003 the TSA falsely placed him on a no-fly list.
O’Keefe Video Sting Exposes Democrats’ Effort to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies
(Breitbart) – Democrats have used trained provocateurs to instigate violence at Republican events nationwide throughout the 2016 election cycle, including at several Donald Trump rallies, using a tactic called “bird-dogging,” according to a new video investigation released Monday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas. The goal of “bird-dogging”: to create a sense of “anarchy” around Donald Trump that would undermine his political support. Often, the tactic uses the most vulnerable people — including the elderly and disabled — to maximize shock value.
O’Keefe’s extensive video investigation reveals that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) are involved in “bird-dogging” and other provocative tactics through a web of consultants led by Robert Creamer, a veteran Chicago activist and convicted felon who is thought to have planned Democrats’ political strategy during the push for Obamacare in 2009 and 2010.
Creamer is also the co-founder of Democracy Partners, a consulting group that, according to Project Veritas videos, apparently contracts directly with the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, and that works with an array of super PACs and consultants to organize, film and publicize their provocations.
Creamer affirms on one video that Clinton is aware of “all” of his work, and that Democracy Partners has a daily telephone call with the Clinton campaign to coordinate efforts.
O’Keefe and his team also obtained hidden camera videos showing one of Creamer’s consultants, Scott Foval, describing “bird-dogging,” among other tactics, and taking credit for having instigated violence at several Republican events during the 2016 election cycle.
Foval — who praises Creamer as “diabolical” — explains how “bird-dogging” works: how they plan confrontations in advance, choose particular individuals to provoke, and maximize media coverage.
FOVAL: So one of the things we do is we stage very authentic grassroots protests right in their faces at their own events. Like, we infiltrate. And then we get it on tape. And then, when our guys get beat up —
Project Veritas: You mean authentic-seeming grassroots?
FOVAL: No, authentic.
PV: You mean —
PV: So like — progressive, what we saw in Madison.
FOVAL: We train up our people, wherever they are, to — and I work with a network of groups, we train them up on how to get themselves into a situation on tape, on camera, that we can use later.
PV: So some of this, so I probably know your work.
FOVAL: I know you do. Everybody does. But —
PV: You mean like a situation where it’s sort of like a —
FOVAL: You remember the Iowa State Fair thing where Scott Walker grabbed the sign out of the dude’s hand and then the dude gets kind of roughed up right in front of the stage right there on camera?
FOVAL: That was all us. The guy that got roughed up is my counterpart, who works for Bob [Creamer].
PV: And that was like, storyboarded? Him getting roughed up like that?
FOVAL: We scenarioed it.
PV: And so you, like leant yourselves to that situation and it happened. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
FOVAL: We not only leant ourselves, we planted multiple people in that front area around him and in the back to make sure there wasn’t just a action that happened up front, there was also a reaction that happened out back. So the cameras, when they saw it, saw double angles of stuff like, they saw what happened up front, and they saw the reaction of people out back.
PV: That’s fucking brilliant. That’s brilliant.
FOVAL: And then the reporters had people to talk to.
Foval also tells Project Veritas’s undercover journalist that Republicans are less adept at such tactics because they obey rules: “They have fewer guys willing to step out on the line for what they believe in. … There is a level of adherence to rules on the other side that only when you’re at the very highest level, do you get over.”
In another video, Foval admits that his organization is responsible for an incident in Asheville, North Carolina in September, where an elderly woman was allegedly assaulted outside a Trump rally.
In that incident, the 69-year-old woman, wearing an oxygen tank, heckled a visually impaired 73-year-old Trump supporter, then pursued him. She claimed he then punched her in the jaw, though she had no visible injury; his attorney claims she touched him on the shoulder first, and then fell to the ground as he turned around. The national media covered her claims widely, while largely ignoring his. Focal explains that the woman had been “trained” as a part of his operation.
Foval also explains how the operation is set up to allow the DNC and the Clinton campaign “plausible deniability” in the event that the true nature of the deliberate violence is discovered: “The thing that we have to watch is making sure there’s a double-blind between the actual campaign and the actual DNC and what we’re doing. There’s a double-blind there, so that they can plausibly deny that they heard anything about it.”
He explains the flow of money in “rapid response” operations: “The campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, the Foval Group goes and executes the shit on the ground.”
And Foval emphasizes that the goal of “bird-dogging” is to create a sense of “anarchy” around Trump: ”The bird-dogging. The aggressive bird-dogging. What I call it is ‘conflict engagement.’ … Conflict engagement in the lines at Trump rallies? We’re starting anarchy. And he needs to understand that we’re starting anarchy.”
In another video, Foval notes that the Clinton campaign and the DNC are involved, through a chain of contracts: “We are contracted directly with the DNC and the campaign. I am contracted to [Robert Creamer] but I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of special events and political for the campaign. Through Bob. We have certain people who do not get to talk to them, at all.”
He explains that Democracy Partners then provides material from the field to the campaign, the DNC, and a wide array of left-wing super PACs and organizations involved in the 2016 election effort:
We have a clip deliverable that we have to deliver every day for our groups of clients who are involved in this project: AUFC; A4C, which is Alliance for Change; Alliance for Retired Americans, which is part of AFL-CIO — they’re one of our partners on the AUFC stuff … Depends on the issue. And then there’s the DNC, and the campaigns, and Priorities [USA]. Priorities is a big part of this, too. The campaigns and DNC cannot coordinate with Priorities, but I guaran-damn-tee you that the people who run the Super PACs all talk to each other, and we and a few other people are the hubs of that communication.
He also explains how the campaign and the super PACs use consultants as intermediaries for communication, since federal law prevents them from coordinating directly. He calls the system the “Pony Express,” linking the DNC through Robert Creamer, through Robert Creamer to Foval, and through Foval to Brad Woodhouse’s super-PAC, Americans United for Change:
FOVAL: We’re consultants, so we’re not the official entity. And so those conversations can be had between consultants who are working for different parts. That’s why there’s Bob, who’s the primary there, and I’m a sub to him. And I’m also a primary to AUFC separately, that’s why.
PV: So there’s like a Morse code between the DNC and that Super PACs.And you guys —
FOVAL: It’s less of a Morse code than it is a text conversation that never ends. It’s like that. It’s kind of like an ongoing “Pony Express.” It’s not as official as it could be, but that’s because the law doesn’t allow it to be.
The videos obtained by O’Keefe and Project Veritas corroborate earlier evidence of a Democratic plan to use violent imagery against the Trump campaign. A DNC PowerPoint presentation from April released by Wikileaks includes a plan to cite “incidents of violence” to create the “desired perception” that “Trump is dangerous and divisive, undermining our values and putting our security at risk.”
The “bird-dogging” carried out by Creamer and others would appear to be part of that effort.
In one hidden camera video, filmed at Creamer’s Washington, D.C. office, Creamer explains that Hillary Clinton is aware of “all” of his activities, directly or indirectly, and that Democracy Partners has a daily conference call with the Clinton campaign, as well as frequent calls with the White House.
Wikileaks reveals that at least one “bird-dogging” operation was approved directly by Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. In an email dated July 4, 2015, Mook approved a plan “to bird dog” Donald Trump, meaning specifically to infiltrate volunteers into his campaign events and ask him questions about immigration.
Trump supporters have frequently been the victims of real, as opposed to staged, violence.
In June, for instance, Trump supporters leaving a rally in San Jose were attacked, beaten and chased by left-wing mobs. One woman was pelted with eggs in full view of the national media. The mayor of San Jose blamed Trump for the violence.
Last week, Hillary Clinton supporters attacked a man carrying a sign that read “Bill Clinton is a Rapist” at rally in Las Vegas hosted by the Carpenters Union.
Creamer, who is married to Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), is a Saul Alinsky acolyte who trained many of the key political figures in the Chicago clique that surrounds Barack Obama. He went to prison in 2006-7 for a check-kiting scheme, but was hired by Obama to train volunteers for his 2008 presidential campaign.
In 2011, Creamer opened Democracy Partners together with other veteran left-wing organizers, including Heather Booth. Creamer’s occasional columns at the Huffington Post also provide talking points to left-wing activists throughout the country, and are circulated among key Democratic staff.
(Full disclosure: the author ran against Schakowsky for Congress in 2010).
Please Watch: Viral Belgian Politician’s Takedown of ‘Weak, Globalist, Obsessed by Multiculturalism’ Hillary
Watch: Viral Belgian Politician’s Takedown of ‘Weak,
Globalist, Obsessed by Multiculturalism’ Hillary
Belgian People’s Party leader Mischaël Modrikamen has released a second video in support of Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump after garnering millions of hits for his declaration that “America should not become another Brussels”.
Shooting to prominence after his first short video — released just hours before the Brussels terror attack in March this year — Mr. Modrikamen has once again slammed Hillary Clinton and called on Mr. Trump to help save America. Repeating his call that the United States should not fall to the interests of globalism and multiculturalism as Western Europe has, Mr. Modrikamen says:
[The] Election is now close. Hillary Clinton is just the kind of politician we have here in Western Europe. Weak, globalist, obsessed by multiculturalism, despising ordinary people, but bending to elites and corporate interests. Right now in Europe, we face migrant invasion, terrorism, violence, rapes. Our way of living is under attack, and industry jobs disappear fast.
Our current leaders failed. And candidate Clinton is just like them.
Linking the candidacy of Donald Trump with the very fate of Western civilisation, the People’s Party leader delivers his call of support for Mr. Trump against a montage of images showing a traditional European family when speaking of the revival of society. Images of Nigel Farage and others accompanied his talk of patriotic voices in Europe who would benefit from a Trump victory:
[The] Donald Trump movement is not anymore about an election, it has become the people’s sacred fight to reclaim it’s sovereignty. We are at a crossroads, decline or revival. We need to bury political correctness, and reject the press’ constant bias, and stop the constant self-inflicted wounds. Donald Trump’s victory will reinforce all patriotic voices here also in Europe. We are facing the same threats and challenges. God Bless America. Mr Trump, make America Great Again”.
Speaking to Breitbart London just days after the deadly Brussels attacks in March, Mr. Modrikamen said Belgium had become a haven for Islamist radicals because it was a weak nation with no coherent identity, and remarked: “I don’t want the United States to become the new Brussels”.
Explaining why socialist politicians were so happy to welcome mass migration, he said:
The leftist parties would have vanished from Brussels without the support of the Muslim population here. And we have to let people know in the United States that according to demographic reports, we now have approximately 30-35 per cent Muslim population, and this is re-enforced every day by the migrant invasion According to these demographic trends, we will have a Muslim majority in 15 to 25 years in Brussels, because of high birth rates and the migrant influx. We also have so many illegals here, we have 150,000 to 200,000 of them.
Signalling his strong support for Mr. Trump, the Belgian politician said:
Mr. Trump, we have this in common. We speak the truth. Of course the political and media elites will never forgive us for that, but ordinary citizens are not fools, Mr. Trump.
Make America great again, you are an example to many of us here in Europe”.
Follow Oliver Lane on Twitter: e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Here Are Hillary Clinton’s Three Speeches To Goldman Sachs For Which She Was Paid $675,000
As has been widely reported, in 2013 Hillary Clinton was paid $675,000 for three speeches to Goldman Sachs. One was delivered on June 4, 2013 at the 2013 IBD CEO Annual Conference at The Inn at Palmetto Bluff in South Carolina, a second one took place on October 24, 2013 at the Goldman Sachs Asset Management AIMS Alternative Investment Symposium, and the last one was delivered on October 29, 2013 at the Goldman Sachs builders and innovators summit.
The speech transcripts, in their entirety, were revealed for the first time in an email from Tony Carrk, research director at Hillary for America, in an email dated January 23, 2016, and disclosed to the public for the first time ever during today’s latest Wikileak of Podesta emails.
In the email Carrk says:
The 3 (I misspoke about 5 earlier) speeches to Goldman are attached with some parts highlighted. Below are some of the more noteworthy quotes.
The highlights Carrk refers to are the following:
In the first excerpt Hillary Clinton (rightfully) mocks Dodd Frank as nothing but a political contrivance which was created solely for political reasons as “there was also a need to do something because for political reasons.” To wit: “*Clinton Said, With Dodd-Frank, There Was “A Need To Do Something Because For Political Reasons” Because Members Of Congress “Can’t Sit Idly By And Do Nothing.”
“And with political people, again, I would say the same thing, you know, there was a lot of complaining about Dodd-Frank, but there was also a need to do something because for political reasons, if you were an elected member of Congress and people in your constituency were losing jobs and shutting businesses and everybody in the press is saying it’s all the fault of Wall Street, you can’t sit idly by and do nothing, but what you do is really important.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
* * *
In the second highlighted excerpt, Tim O’Neill, Global Co-Head of the Investment Management Division, thanks Hillary for her “continued involvement in the issues (inaudible) to be courageous in some respects to associated with Wall Street and this environment” and then thanks her “very much.”
*Tim O’Neill Told Clinton “We Really Did Appreciate It” When She Had Been “Courageous In Some Respects To Associated With Wall Street And This Environment.”
“MR. O’NEILL: By the way, we really did appreciate when you were the senator from New York and your continued involvement in the issues (inaudible) to be courageous in some respects to associated with Wall Street and this environment. Thank you very much. SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don’t feel particularly courageous. I mean, if we’re going to be an effective, efficient economy, we need to have all part of that engine running well, and that includes Wall Street and Main Street. And there’s a big disconnect and a lot of confusion right now. So I’m not interested in, you know, turning the clock back or pointing fingers, but I am interested in trying to figure out how we come together to chart a better way forward and one that will restore confidence in, you know, small and medium-size businesses and consumers and begin to chip away at the unemployment rate. So it’s something that I, you know, if you’re a realist, you know that people have different roles to play in politics, economics, and this is an important role, but I do think that there has to be an understanding of how what happens here on Wall Street has such broad consequences not just for the domestic but the global economy, so more thought has to be given to the process and transactions and regulations so that we don’t kill or maim what works, but we concentrate on the most effective way of moving forward with the brainpower and the financial power that exists here.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
* * *
In a third noted excerpt, Clinton pitches the idea that the best regulation of Wall Street is self-regulation because “the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.”
*Speaking About Financial Regulations, Clinton Said “The People That Know The Industry Better Than Anybody Are The People Who Work In The Industry.”
“There’s nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out what works? And the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
* * *
In a fourth excerpt, Hillary admits she had “great relations and worked so close together” with Wall Street and has “a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it.”
*Clinton Said “I Represented All Of You For Eight Years. I Had Great Relations And Worked So Close Together After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown.”
*“I represented all of you for eight years. I had great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to rebuild downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it, but I do — I think that when we talk about the regulators and the politicians, the economic consequences of bad decisions back in ’08, you know, were devastating, and they had repercussions throughout the world.” [GS2, 10/24/13]
The fifth and final highlighted excerpt blames banks’ unwillingness to “do what they need to do” due to fear of regulations, the same regulations which in the same speech she said should be left to Wall Street.
*Clinton Said “Banks Are Not Doing What They Need To Do Because They’re Scared Of Regulations, They’re Scared Of The Other Shoe Dropping.”
*“I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth. So people are, you know, a little — they’re still uncertain, and they’re uncertain both because they don’t know what might come next in terms of regulations, but they’re also uncertain because of changes in a global economy that we’re only beginning to take hold of.” [GS2, 10/24/13] Read On>>>>>
* * *