April 2018
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
PAYPAL Donations

< If you don’t stand behind our troops, why don’t you stand in front of them.

Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

Proud to be an American.

Salute a Veteran!

Please consider a monthly donation; Click on the PayPal Button to contribute with PayPal

Donating by PayPal is Safe and Convenient

Send Checks to: The Highlands Tea Party 4196 Smoke signal Sebring, FL 33872

All donations are greatly appreciated, Thank You & God Bless

Donations are not tax-deductible.

My God! How little do my countrymen know what precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no other people on earth enjoy! ~Thomas Jefferson P>

THTP - POLL
General information

Archive for April 9th, 2018

A STORY ABOUT HOW AMERICA WAS ALMOST DE3STROYED


This could be the most important video you have ever watched.
Most definitely worth the time!

Grab a cup of Hot coffee or Chocolate, sit back and take
ten minutes to watch this video, Absorb with what you
know, have seen and heard. Then you be the judge

TRUTH……no ‘fake news’, all documented, but not reported
by the MSN!

 

Black America needs to look in the mirror and stop blaming others, especially white people.

L. Todd Wood
 L. Todd Wood, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, flew special operations helicopters supporting SEAL Team 6, Delta Force and others. After leaving the military, he pursued his other passion, finance, spending 18 years on Wall Street trading emerging market debt, and later, writing. The first of his many thrillers is “Currency.” Todd is a contributor to Fox Business, Newsmax TV, Moscow Times, the New York Post, the National Review, Zero Hedge and others.. For more information about L. Todd Wood, visit LToddWood.com.

ANALYSIS/OPINION:
 I know of no white person alive today in the United States who has ever legally owned a black slave, or any slave for that matter. Almost 700,000 mostly white men died 160 years ago to end slavery. Jim Crow ended generations ago. Yet black America, for the most part, is still locked in inner-city gang violence and economic hardship. Why?    Is it because America is racist?  Is it because of some overhanging white supremacy?  Is it because of the Illuminati?

No, unfortunately, it is because of black culture and the adoption of Democratic Party government dependency.  We have just had eight years of the first black president.  Black athletes, and entertainers, routinely earn multi-million dollar incomes.  I can easily name several black billionaires without even trying too hard. A large percentage of black America is very successful. But, it is not enough. Too many black youth are being left behind.

And it is no one but black America’s fault.  

No one can solve this problem but black America.  No one can throw enough money at it.  We’ve tried that.  Black America needs to look in the mirror and stop blaming others, especially white people.   I am obviously white and conservative, and I served in the military, which, during my time, was as color blind as you could be. I can also honestly say I don’t give a damn what color your skin is, neither do any of my friends.  I do care about your actions.  

Blacks are around 15 percent of the population. Depending on what study you look at, they commit around 40 percent to 50 percent of violent crime in America. Of course, there is going to be a problem with police.  And, of course, there are some bad policemen. However, those bad apples do not kill black people statistically anymore than they kill white people.  Even Harvard said that recently. If you were a cop, and you had to work in a neighborhood infested with crime and murder, wouldn’t you act differently than in a neighborhood where there was little crime? The most effective thing black America could do to improve its relationship with police is to significantly reduce violent crime where they live.  Yes, that means change the culture of where you live and your community.  

I for one am tired of being blamed.  I am tired of dealing with people who only want something from others.  I don’t oppress anyone.  I don’t hold anyone down.  I’m tired of getting on the D.C. metro and seeing white people being harassed by roaming gangs of black youth with their pants around their knees.  Yes, you want a white person uncomfortable?  That makes me uncomfortable.  It’s our nation’s capital and it’s embarrassing.  

Blacks have nothing but opportunity in America.  Try finding the same opportunity anywhere else in the world.  If you are born in America you’ve won life’s economic lottery.  Take advantage of it.  The problem is this generation has been taught an agenda of cultural Marxism by our education system.  They’ve been taught to be a victim, and it’s still going on.  All you have to do is watch the young black, female student at Yale screaming at the college president to understand that.  Blacks in America don’t even know how good they have it . 
Don’t kneel when my anthem is played.  Too many people died for that flag.  You are free to protest but not then..  I am free to not watch, or pay to watch you play if you do that.  The NFL should make it a rule that you stand for the national anthem.  There is no free speech to disobey a private employer on private property..  This would solve the problem immediately.

The NFL has deeply offended most of America.  They will pay an economic and reputational price, as they should.
We have a real cultural problem in this country, the result of the Leftist multicultural agenda.  Multi-ethnicity is perfect and should be encouraged.  Having more than one American culture is destroying the country  But then again, that is what the Left wants.

 Do Black Lives Matter

 It is your job to determine if this is a racist rant or just a review of factual data…
 WHAT IF ALL THE BLACKS SUDDENLY LEFT AMERICA, WHICH IS 13.3% OF THE TOTAL U.S..POPULATION:
Amount of people in poverty would drop – 34%, 
The prison population would go down by -37%, 
Welfare recipients would go down by – – – 42%, 
Gang members would go down by – – – – – 53% 
Chlamydia cases would go down – – – – – – 54%, 
Homelessness would go down – – – – – – – -57% 
Syphilis would go down  – – – – – – – – – – – – 58%. 
AIDS & HIV would go down by – – – – – – – -65%, 
Gonorrhea would go down – – – – – – – – – – -69%, 
Average ACT scores would go UP – – – – – 5.5 points. 
Average IQ would go UP – – – – – – – – – – – -7.4 points,  putting us 3rd in the world tied with Japan,
Average SAT scores would go UP almost – – – – -100 points, 
The average income for Americans would go UP over $20,000 a year,

 BUT DEMOCRATS WOULD LOSE 76% OF THEIR VOTING BASE!!!
And, many criminal defense attorneys would have to find another line of work!
Yes, Black lives DO matter!

DISCLAIMER:  Any views or opinions presented in this commentary are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of ‘The Highlands Tea Party’.  This documentation is sent for informational purposes only, it is your choice to read, forward, or delete.

This website contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner in some cases. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. – and to encourage open, free, and informed citizen participation in the political process, of the sort that is the duty of all Americans. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of such copyrighted material as provided in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Loretta Lynch Throws Comey Under The Bus – ‘Concerns Were Not Raised’ Can believe NBC and the left?

Loretta Lynch cast aspersions on James Comey’s congressional testimony, in which he suggested the former attorney general had told the former FBI director to refer to the Hillary Clinton email probe as a “matter, not an investigation.”  “He said it made him feel strange,” NBC’s Lester Holt asked Lynch in an interview first previewed Monday. “He noted it. What did you mean when you said matter instead and not a investigation?”  “I heard about that testimony,” Lynch responded. “I didn’t watch it at the time, but it was brought to my attention later and people were raising it with me.”
“My first response was, ‘where, what is the issue here?’ I remember specifically talking with him — as we talked about sensitive things on a number of occasions,” she continued. “We often would have to discuss sensitive matters, sensitive issues, terrorism and the like, law enforcement policy and the like.”
 “This was a very sensitive investigation, as everyone knew,” she claimed. “And the issue when he and I sat down at that time, which I think was early in the fall of 2015, was whether or not we were ready as an department to confirm an investigation going on, when we typically do not confirm or deny investigations into anything, with rare exceptions.”  “I can tell you that it was a meeting like any other that we had had, where we talked about the issues,” Lynch added when Holt asked if Comey questioned her “credibility” with regard to the Clinton investigation. “We had a full and open discussion about it.”
“Concerns were not raised.”

&nbsp;

What is an Assault Weapon? Any weapon becomes an “assault weapon” when the user attacks another party with it.

‘Assault Weapon’: The Semantic Trojan Horse
that represents a real threat to our
constitutional rights.

There is no better example of muddy thinking than the expression “assault weapon.”  This expression is a combination of two inexact lay terms that are together even more unclear.  The expression has something of a visceral punch that news reporters and pubescent demonstrators find as useful as aging senators do.  The muddiness suits them.  Therein lies its danger.
A weapon, after all, can be anything.  In the case of London, the weapons of choice these days are knives and acid.  At the other end of the spectrum, some people are so assertive that a dirty look can instill fear.  Consider “rapier wit.”
So what is the difference between a knife in a housewife’s kitchen for chopping vegetables and a knife wielded against an innocent London tube passenger?  The difference is intent.  Any weapon becomes an “assault weapon” when the user attacks another party with it.  The “assault” nature of any weapon lies in the heart of its possessor.
Many Americans who seem to accept that this vague phrase means “big bad guns in the hands of madmen.”  Under its banner, a lot is happening.
The expression “assault weapon” is a semantic Trojan horse that represents a real threat to our constitutional rights.  Since it does not define the weapons in question, it can be used to define anything people want to get rid of, starting with semi-automatic long guns and ending with revolvers and even ammunition.  “Banning” such weapons means a whole lot more than merely ceasing their sale; it addresses the guns already in the hands of citizens.  It addresses this issue through the holy grail of lefties everywhere: confiscation.  Criminals don’t give a damn about this expression or any other you might want to use to interfere with their lives, so confiscation under an “assault weapons ban” is limited to law-abiding gun-owners.
This phrase has been normalized through continual use by the media.  People accept its use and should not.  This phrase should never appear in any law, regulation, or policy.  Lawmakers should specify what they are banning or confiscating and should have to amend the law to add another weapon.
An excellent article points out that gun confiscation has already started.  They start out with “assault weapons,” which the politicians define.  How hard would it be to add a gun or two to the ban?  You wouldn’t even see it go by.
I have seen photos like this of confiscated weapons.  The photos include small revolvers.  The small guns are not sexy enough for movie stars.  They have no magazines, no safety, and limited ammunition capacity – so how did they get picked up while rooting out “assault weapons”?
Representative Jan Schakowsky of Illinois didn’t realize she was talking to a conservative reporter at a Feb. 13 press conference when she had this exchange:

“We want everything on the table,” Schakowsky told Mattera.  “This is a moment of opportunity.  There’s no question about it.”

One poignant exchange was as follows:

Schakowsky: We’re on a roll now, and I think we’ve got to take the–you know, we’re gonna push as hard as we can and as far as we can.

Mattera: So the assault weapons ban is just the beginning?

Schakowsky: Oh absolutely.  I mean, I’m against handguns.  We have, in Illinois, the Council Against Handgun…something [Violence].  Yeah, I’m a member of that.  So, absolutely.

In Seattle, police have begun seizing guns under their “Red Flag Law,” which allows the policeman to make decisions on the fly.

 Washington state is one of five states that has passed the law, known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order, which gives law enforcement the ability to seize a gun from a person if they believe the person poses a significant danger to themself [sic] or others.

They leapt right past the “assault” part and went right for any firearm they felt like taking.

Guns are removed for one year, but there is due process. Only family, roommates and police can petition the court for the civil order. The burden of proof is on the petitioner. A judge determines if the person is a danger to himself or others. If the order is issued, the guns can be seized immediately, but the gun owner gets to make his or her case in court within two weeks.

“Family”?  Does this include third cousins?  “Roommates”?  Does this include vindictive ex-girlfriends?  I’m not sure making your case to a typically liberal Seattle judge falls under the umbrella of due process.  And what happens at the end of the year?  Do they come and find you and give you your stuff back?  I doubt it.
The vague phrase “assault weapon” has been misused to stampede lawmakers into passing laws whose close scrutiny would make those laws unthinkable.  It has been used by lawmakers to whip people, particularly teenagers prone to drama queenery, into making amorphous demands and interpreting those demands to mean what the liberal politicians always wanted.  The press makes sure the issue gets wall-to-wall coverage as evidence of chaos, while politicians insert their stealthy statutes into the mix as the only solution: convince a few thousand kids that their bill is the answer, and ram it through before their attention span fades.
Progressives insist that the founders of our country did not envision so many guns in public hands when they crafted the amendments.  Not true.  Gun ownership was ubiquitous in their day.  The way I see it, the founders needed the public to place a great deal of faith and trust in them.  I think it was a deal-clincher to include the people’s right to make sure no one took over their country or did anything to prevent citizens from protecting themselves – you get to keep your personal guns, and you get to assemble with other like-minded people who also have guns.  At worst, you can go down fighting.  Why in the world would we let scheming bullies bleed this away?
The least we should do is make politicians specify exactly what they want to confiscate instead of allowing a generic term to give them carte blanche.  If they want to change the Constitution, let them do it through the amendment process.  It’s not easy to get two thirds of the states to go along with the destruction of a treasured right.  It’s not supposed to be easy.
I’m praying for lawsuits and lots of them.
THTP OFFICERS

CHAIRMAN
John Nelson - jenkan04@gmail.com
VICE CHAIRMAN
Bob Gilmore
TREASURE
Dick Fankhauser