January 2021
« Dec    
PAYPAL Donations

< If you don’t stand behind our troops, why don’t you stand in front of them.

Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

Proud to be an American.

Salute a Veteran!

Please consider a monthly donation; Click on the PayPal Button to contribute with PayPal

Donating by PayPal is Safe and Convenient

Send Checks to: The Highlands Tea Party 4196 Smoke signal Sebring, FL 33872

All donations are greatly appreciated, Thank You & God Bless

Donations are not tax-deductible.

My God! How little do my countrymen know what precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no other people on earth enjoy! ~Thomas Jefferson P>

General information

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

One, two, three…how Big Tech coordinated to take out Parler

Good morning!
Blessings on you and your family, and from all the Huckabee staff!
Today’s newsletter includes:
1)  One, two, three…how Big Tech coordinated to take out Parler
2)  Pointless Congressional Theatrics Update
3)  A warning about violence and the Boogaloo movement
4)  Will Pelosi impeach herself?
5)  Advertisement: The Mediterranean Experience
Thank you again for subscribing!  To read this newsletter on my website, go here .
Sincerely,  Mike Huckabee
One, two, three…how Big Tech coordinated to take out Parler
By Mike Huckabee
Perhaps the best source I can point to on what Big Broth—I mean, Big Tech, is doing to conservatives is, ironically, the non-conservative Glenn Greenwald, who has had to “go independent” because of his straightforwardness and is now on Substack,com .
Tuesday, he posted a commentary called “How Silicon Valley, In a Show of Monopolistic Force, Destroyed Parler,” which details the principles of privacy and free speech behind the social media platform and its growth after being set up in August 2018. That growth spiked dramatically after other social media censored the NEW YORK POST’s story about Hunter Biden and started deleting posts even by the President of the United States, labeling them “misinformation.” When Twitter finally terminated Trump’s access, that was enough for millions, and they started leaving in droves for Parler.
As Greenwald notes, the people behind Parler had done exactly what the social media giants had always said to do: If you don’t like the rules we impose, go start your own platform and make your own rules. But when Parler succeeded, they fought dirty to force it out of business. Just when it became the most downloaded app in the country, tech giants Apple, Amazon and Google worked seamlessly as one to abruptly remove it from the internet.
If Parler’s attorney’s are reading, Greenwald offers the perfect opening statement for when their HUGE LAWSUIT reaches court: “If one were looking for evidence to demonstrate that these tech behemoths are, in fact, monopolies that engage in anti-competitive behavior in violation of anti-trust laws, and will obliterate any attempt to compete with them in the marketplace, it would be difficult to imagine anything more compelling than how they just used their unconstrained power to utterly destroy a rising competitor.”
Greenwald tells how this unfolded, starting with a letter from Apple that said they’d received “numerous complaints” and “accusations that the Parler app was used to plan, coordinate, and facilitate the illegal activities in Washington, DC, on January 6, 2021, that led…to loss of life, numerous injuries, and the destruction of property.” It warned that they must submit the requested “moderation improvement plan” within 24 hours or their app would be removed from the Apple app store.
Not surprisingly, the letter was immediately leaked to BUZZFEED, which, not surprisingly, published it in full. Parler tried to communicate with Apple without success. The next day, Apple told Parler that it wouldn’t distribute apps that represent “dangerous and harmful content” and removed them. An app that’s not downloaded from the Apple store cannot be used with an iPhone. As Greenwald explains, even if the Parler app has already been downloaded, it won’t be updated, which will soon render the platform “both unmanageable and unsafe.”
Google struck Blow #2, “suspending” Parler from its Play Store, thus severely limiting users’ ability to download it onto Android phones.
The next day, Amazon delivered Blow #3, informing Parler that its web hosting service was terminating them. Parler was then, effectively, offline. Amazon said: “Because Parler cannot comply with our terms of service and poses a very real risk to public safety, we plan to suspend Parler’s account effective Sunday, January 10th…”
In a matter of just a few days, Parler went from being the most popular and fastest-growing app in the country to being banished from the internet.
Leftists, who used to be pro-free speech, are cheering the demise of Parler. Ding, dong, the First Amendment is dead!
But Parler wasn’t designed to be an echo chamber of MAGA-hatted Trump supporters. As Greenwald describes it, “The platform was created based in libertarian values of privacy, anti-surveillance, anti-data collection, and free speech.” It was for people who wanted privacy and didn’t like the idea of being “data-mined.” It was also for those who increasingly objected to the rules about what could or could not be said — and no, that doesn’t apply to calls for violence, which are against Parler’s terms of service anyway and are already illegal on any platform.
Explicit calls for violence are rampant on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (owned by Google). The Capitol breach was planned largely on Facebook and Twitter, including by members of QAnon. No participants have been found to be active on Parler.
Yet it’s the threat of more Capitol Hill-style violence that is purportedly causing Big Tech’s crackdown on Parler. Obviously, that’s just pretense for censoring conservative opinion.
Greenwald’s article is very detailed and examines Big Tech’s close relationship with politicians and the intelligence bureaucracy. It’s a must-read.
On Tuesday, Greenwald, appearing with Tucker Carlson, said Big Tech companies are “acting like nation-states,” with Facebook even setting up “committees” to decide what speech is true, false, dangerous, not dangerous. Sounds as though Winston Smith of 1984 would be right home there.
Greenwald pointed out that even world leaders who are not fans of President Trump, such as Germany’s Angela Merkel, are now speaking out about how dangerous Silicon Valley has become by “anointing itself the world media that controls and is more powerful than their democracies, because they know that’s coming for their democracies as well.”
He elaborated on what he’d said in his commentary, noting that out of the first 13 arrested for Capitol Hill violence, “a total of zero” were active on Parler. Most of the advocacy and planning had been done on Facebook, YouTube (Google) and Twitter. Yet AOC and others with power in the Democrat Party were demanding that Google and Apple “kick Parler off.” If their concern really is to stop violence, why weren’t they calling for Facebook and YouTube to be de-platformed?
Here’s one clue: Biden reportedly got ten times more money from Big Tech than Trump did. The real menace is that they’re working hand in hand now to control all expression. This is blatantly illegal and unconstitutional, but unless you want to talk about how “woke” you are and how much you still hate Trump, the plan is to leave you with cute fuzzy puppies and pictures of food. Any political or societal point of view that doesn’t get the leftist gold star will have to go.
Tucker also hosted Glenn Beck , who said he’d built his own media company in anticipation of this coming. With the current political upheaval and the technological upheaval, he said, these two powers “need each other.”
As a caution, Beck compared what’s happening to what FDR did to Japanese-Americans during World War II, confiscating their wealth, shutting their businesses and, eventually, even isolating them in camps. “You can’t have freedom of speech,” Beck explained, “if you can’t express yourself in a meaningful place.”
“This is like the Germans with the Jews behind the wall,” he said. “…This is the digital ghetto.”
Beck is taking heat, of course, for making that comparison. But as he explained, he wasn’t literally comparing the current situation to Nazi Germany, just using it as an example to show the direction things can move without constitutional protection. He issued a warning: “If you don’t stand up for free speech, you will be the one that loses it as well.”


The following observations are from a personal friend of mine.  I’ve known,  for over 30 years.  I immediately called him after reading his email to confirm he was the one who wrote it.  I trust his observations.  His brief video and the news I’ve seen back up his story.
Web Master: I personally don’t know this person, I was sent this information, thought it  was important that people hear and see what transpired at the Capitol from close up eyewitness, from his detailed description it sounds very much like a staged situation By Capitol Police for the press to film.. 


This is my eyewitness account, along with a few images from my own camera, of the Jan 6 protest at the US Capitol Building in Washington DC.
Unfortunately, we Americans have become accustomed to corruption and dishonesty from our elite leaders.  However, this day revealed to me the terrible depth of this corruption– as I witnessed the Capitol Police blatantly stage a mock “attack” by peaceful protesters, while the Police were actually encouraging the very same protesters to enter the grounds and roam freely.
While a few people did behave badly and vandalize the building, the entire media narrative requires the public to believe that an overwhelming mass of people, “stormed” the building, “breached” security lines, “over-ran” the police, and was a “violent mob”.  I will explain how this narrative is an outrageous lie deliberately staged for the media by the wickedly corrupt DC Police.
These are the facts that I witnessed:
Location/Time:  I was on the West-side of the building from 1pm to 4pm– from the beginning of the supposed mob attack, to well past the time when USAF veteran Ashlie Babbitt was shot and killed by police inside the building.
Many of the images shown by the media come from this side of the building.
My camera highlights matching the events described below are captured in this video  https://youtu.be/7HSe4Z1W7m0
  • Stage 1:
    When I arrived at the building, I was approximately 30′ from the front edge of the crowd.
    The police had an ideal defensive situation, as the Capitol building sits atop a 35’ vertical limestone wall.  To access the Capitol building from my location, you first needed to enter the courtyard 35’ above.
    o   The only route to the courtyard was through a single narrow stairwell.
    o   The cops needed only to defend the stairwell from above to contain the crowd.
    Instead of staying on the high ground, the police defied all tactical logic by going to ground level and directly engaging the peaceful crowd.

    o   Then, without warning, police began firing flash/bang grenades, tear gas, and pepper spray into the crowd.
      Prior to this attack the police made no attempt to communicate with the crowd; they did not declare “an unlawful assembly” or ask the crowd to leave—they simply attacked a peaceful crowd.
    o   A tear gas canister struck me in the head, knocking my eyeglasses to the ground.
    The police continued to abuse the crowd for 30-45 minutes, allowing the media to get the pictures and video showing the police “repelling” the supposed attack. 
    o   It is worth noting, that the police appeared to be baiting the crowd to counterattack because the only visible police were 5-10 very skinny, very unintimidating officers, (definitely NOT the Alpha-male, linebacker types you expect to be riot troops) in front of a crowd of tens of thousands.  However, the crowd remained peaceful.
    When the media had their images and it became clear that crowd was not going to attack the police or the building. 
    o   The police behavior suddenly changed from “repelling the mob” to becoming tour-guides allowing the people to climb the stairs, enter the courtyard and even enter the building.
    o   Obviously, had the protesters stayed on the ground below the courtyard stairwell the narrative of the storming, violent mob overrunning the police would have collapsed.
     Stage 2
    The last two scenes in my video are from the courtyard above the 35’ wall and immediately behind the Capitol building.
    Please watch carefully for the following:
      Everyone entering the courtyard is walking past 4 police officers standing atop the single easily defended stairwell that allows access to the ground below.  The cops are just hanging out talking, while minutes before they had been launching tear gas at the crowd.  There is no sign of aggression, urgency, or running by anyone involved.
      The mostly middle-aged normal Americans were simply walking calmly with their wives/girlfriends.  I saw many in their 50s and 60s and even one couple that had to be in the late 70s.  These are the people that the media and DC establishment would have you believe is a violent mob capable of storming and breaching police defenses.  Many of them probably couldn’t run 50 feet on flat ground.
    o   Some of these people were curious enough to enter the Capitol building and reported that cops were present inside and passively observing people walk around the building within the roped off walkways.
    The last scene–the group unfolding the gigantic American flag–was taken at 3pm, about the time Ashlie Babbitt was shot and killed inside the building.  
    o   In other words, at the peak of the claimed “mob-violence.”
    o   This scene is less than 50’ from an open door into the Capitol building that people are freely passing in/out of with police approval.
    Stage 3
    I left the Capitol building at 4pm by simply walking down the stairs and away from the building.
    This was about 3 hours after the police initially attacked the crowd with tear gas and flash/bang grenades.
    o   A reasonable person would expect that, with the National Guard already called up the previous day, the authorities would have had plenty of time to surround the building and apprehend any “rioters” trying to escape.
    o   However, I saw no police at all as I walked away from the building.
    I suspect that arresting a bunch of middle-aged “normies,” grandpas and grandmas wouldn’t have served the narrative that the police had corruptly staged.
Please pass the word and pray that God will restore our country.
I swear that all of this is true,
[Name redacted for fear of retribution]

Attachments area

YouTube video
US Capitol Eyewitness View


This is supported by articles in the New York Post, and the Washington Examiner.

It is now understood that 20 laptops were confiscated by Special forces, Pelosi’s being one of them.


Pelosi unhinged as Trump allies release her dealings with China copied from her laptop

by Editor, cairnsnews


by Alex Bruce

There were a lot of weird blackouts over the weekend; at the Vatican, Berlin and in Pakistan, where nearly one half of the country was completely without power.

Simon Parkes explains that the blackout in Pakistan was to prevent a major deal from going down, in which a CCP front corporation would have bought the US corporate behemoth, General Electric for a mere $5.4 billion.

He says the secret deal was discovered on Nancy Pelosi’s laptop, which was stolen by Special Forces during the “storming” of the Capitol last week.

General Electric (GE) was one of the original 12 companies listed on the Dow Jones Industrial Average in the late 19th century. It’s been at the forefront of American technology and manufacturing for over 130 years and, importantly, in this story, it is a major manufacturer of engines for both commercial and military aircraft.

Many recall how GE CEO, Jack Welch was a corporate hero throughout the ’90s. GE was a corporate powerhouse. In 2011, it was ranked among the Fortune 20 as the 14th-most profitable company.

GE has since very severely underperformed the market (by about 75%) as its profitability collapsed.

GE’s earnings in 2019 were negative $5.4 billion, rendering this once-great American industrial giant into the biggest distressed asset on the planet.

In 2019, GE was hit with allegations of $38 billion in accounting fraud and in October 2020, GE was notified that the Securities Exchange Commission make take civil action for possible violations of securities laws.

In the wake of the targeted corruption of our government by the CCP, one wonders if the same compromise operations were also used in the take-down and hostile takeover of one of the most important US corporations – which was, thankfully thwarted?

In Simon Parkes’ Sunday podcast, he said that Nancy Pelosi’s laptop revealed that was that she was facilitating the CCP’s purchase of GE for $5.4 billion, which is a ridiculously low price for a corporation with over $266 billion in assets, even in its very depressed current state.

Since the Hunter Biden laptop was released last October by Chinese dissident billionaire Miles Guo, he has been claiming that the CCP’s plan for total world domination was based on a relentless campaign of compromise operations.

Many more interesting details can be heard in Simon Parkes’ broadcast from Sunday morning…including his claim that President Trump signed the Insurrection Act on Saturday night.

Lt. General Thomas McInerney, White House, ‘Special Forces Have Pelosi’s Laptop, She’s Frantic’

This is a must watch video this man does not lie!

President Donald Trump is eager to defend himself against accusations laid out by Democrats!

Navarro: Trump ‘Itching to Defend Himself’ Against Impeachment

January 11, 2021 Updated: January 11, 2021
President Donald Trump is eager to defend himself against accusations laid out by Democrats in a fresh impeachment push, a top adviser said Monday.
“The president is just itching to defend himself on this issue and we have the receipts,” Peter Navarro, a staunch Trump ally who advises the president on trade issues, said on “War Room: Pandemic.”
“Bring it on, because we’ve got the receipts,” he added.
Democrats on Monday released a resolution charging Trump with “incitement of insurrection,” accusing Trump of inspiring the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Trump in a speech that day called for supporters to go to the Capitol, but stressed they should stay peaceful.
Democrats have been trying to pressure Vice President Mike Pence and the Cabinet to remove Trump via the 25th Amendment. A source told The Epoch Times that Pence doesn’t support invoking it, and Housing Secretary Ben Carson said Democrats should drop the matter, noting that few days remain until Trump’s term ends.
A House Republican on Monday blocked a resolution calling on Pence to invoke the amendment.
If Pence and a majority of the Cabinet don’t invoke the amendment, Democrats plan on proceeding with another impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told colleagues in a recent letter.
A host of Republican lawmakers have urged Democrats to think hard about the push, saying pursuing impeachment will further divide an already divided country.
“A presidential impeachment should not occur in the heat of the moment, but rather after great deliberation,” a group of House Republicans said in a letter on Saturday to President-elect Joe Biden. “We respectfully urge you to encourage Speaker Pelosi to set aside this partisan effort immediately.”
Democrats successfully impeached Trump last year but the Senate voted to acquit him. No president in U.S. history has been impeached and convicted.
Navarro said that the push to impeach Trump a second time “just opened a huge door.”
“They’re overplaying their hand. They always overplay their hand. This is going to bite them you know where,” he said.
Jack Phillips, Janita Kan, and Samuel Allegri contributed to this report.
Follow Zachary on Twitter: @zackstieber


Fox News Panics, Demotes MacCallum as Newsmax Rises

Fox News Panics, Demotes MacCallum as Newsmax Rises
Monday, 11 January 2021 01:22 PM

MacCallum’s “The Story” had long been the #1 cable news show in the 7 p.m. time slot, until Newsmax TV’s “Greg Kelly Reports” began a ratings surge in recent months.  With Kelly pulling an average of 800,000-plus viewers per minute each night, MacCallum had fallen to third place behind CNN and MSNBC.

In December “Greg Kelly Reports” beat MacCallum in a key demo, a news story broken by CNN.

Newsmax has consistently taken one-third to one-half of Fox’s audience in each day part, according to the Nielsen Coverage Rating. The Coverage Rating shows a network’s viewership proportionate to the homes that can tune in.  Last week the Nielsen Coverage Rating for 7 p.m. showed that in the crucial 35-64 demo, “Greg Kelly Reports” was pulling more than half of MacCallum’s “The Story” (.77 versus 1.53).

The Nielsen numbers tell only half the story. Newsmax streams free on most OTT platforms and Fox News does not.

Newsmax estimates the OTT viewership nearly doubles its Nielsen average viewership numbers.
Newsmax’s consistently strong numbers have caused Fox to make additional changes.
Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott Monday announced a full shift in its daytime lineup.

MacCallum will be moved to the 3 p.m. spot and replaced by new show “FOX News Primetime” with hosts to be announced. The changes will debut on Jan. 18.  Other changes include that Harris Faulkner will no longer host “Outnumbered Overtime” at 1 p.m., but will host a new show, “The Faulkner Focus,” at 11 a.m.

Chief White House Correspondent John Roberts is moving to the studio as co-anchor of a new two-hour program with Sandra Smith.

Important: See Newsmax TV now carried in 70 million cable homes, on DirecTV Ch. 349, Dish Network Ch. 216, Xfinity Ch. 1115, Spectrum, U-verse Ch. 1220, FiOS Ch. 615, Optimum Ch. 102, Cox cable, Suddenlink Ch. 102, CenturyLink 1209, Mediacom Ch. 277, Frontier 615 or Find More Cable Systems – Click Here.

© 2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

“The very concept of a snap impeachment runs against the grain of the Constitution!

Turley Dismisses ‘Snap Impeachment’ Effort

jonathan turley sits at table
George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley (Bonnie Cash-Pool/Getty Images)

By Theodore Bunker    |   Monday, 11 January 2021 11:46 AM

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley has dismissed Democrats’ efforts to target President Donald Trump with a “snap impeachment” following the riot at the Capitol last week.
“The very concept of a snap impeachment runs against the grain of the Constitution. This was supposed to be a deliberative, not an impulsive, process. It’s rather, you know, curious that you have House leadership saying they may just impeach and wait months. Why not do this the correct way? Why not hold an inquiry, have a hearing?” Turley said on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” on Monday.
“There are very serious implications about what is occurring. And the first of those issues is this snap impeachment idea. You are creating a pathway for this type of impulse by impeachment. This is what we are talking about here. There is a desire not to have that inquiry or hearing to look at the implications of what they are going to do. There are serious questions here that we need to discuss,” he added.
“They are suggesting impeaching a president over a speech that many of us called reckless. But it’s a type of vicarious impeachment in the sense that he doesn’t call for violence in his speech. He in fact tells his followers to be peaceful, he says the reason they should go to the Capitol is to support members who are challenging the election. And to encourage other members to join them.”
Turley concluded, “So the speech itself would not meet any definition, as a criminal matter, of incitement.”

Big Tech, Big Media, Pandemic – Welcome to the Endarkenment

Welcome to the Endarkenment

For the past few decades Western culture has gradually drifted toward totalitarian rule. This trend is now accelerating in an astonishing manner, as three factors, Big Tech, the legacy media and the Pandemic, are presenting an opportunity to restructure societies in such a way as to restrict free thought as well as the free movement of people.
This new Endarkenment is made possible through the stunning tech advances of the past two decades and is being heralded by Big Tech, which is in the act of seizing control of peoples’ freedom of speech, and soon to come, peoples’ freedom of thought. They will establish the tenor of what individuals are allowed to say and think, as they now have near absolute control over most forms of communications, giving them the power to control what individuals are allowed to see, read and hear.
It’s no accident that that the ‘five devils’ are actively censoring and quashing alternative on-line media.

Big tech is watching

When George Orwell wrote 1984 the prevalent message to the populace was that “Big Brother is watching.” As a result, any thought, action or behavior inconsistent with official orthodoxy would result in a conviction for “thought crime.”
As you are reading this Big Tech is watching to ensure no thought crimes take place. Take for example, Twitter boss Jack Dorsey’s decision to suspend the New York Post’s account over reporting that President-elect Joe Biden’s son is under investigation for tax fraud and possibly other, more sordid crimes. While indeed, the Hunter Biden story was legitimate, censoring its distribution across the Internet reeks of election tampering.
Dorsey has had an incalculable influence on the outcome of November’s election. The head of a private corporation should not have the power to censor free speech and ideas, even though the company is publicly traded, and purports to be a messaging platform. What good is a messaging platform that only messages orthodoxy?
Facebook isn’t any different in that it has refined its ability to limit distribution of words and ideas with which it disagrees through Soviet-style censorship. What’s more, it was recently revealed that the company is tracking the on-line behavior and activities of its users across multiple platforms, meaning what you post to Twitter or any other web site, Facebook’s algorithms duly record and save for prosperity.
But it doesn’t end there. The Tech Giants are also tracking our on-line behavior and using our usage habits to sell to advertisers, giving them an enormous advantage in the free market, despite anti-trust laws governing such behavior.
What’s more, Big Tech is now curating the Internet to control who and what has access and what the general populace is allowed to know. Recently, the alternative messaging platform, Parler, was banned from Google Play, the Apple App store and from Amazon Web Services for its failure to censor content, or as the folks at Google call it, “egregious content.” In reality Big Tech is feathering its nest by attempting to eliminate competition.
Parler’s Chief Policy Officer, Amy Pleikoff told Fox News “Do we want all of the content that is posted online, every single piece to be scanned for ‘objectionable content,’ as they call it, 24/7 and also removed without due process if it’s flagged by an algorithm because that seems to be the standard that Parler is being told that we must adhere to,” she said.
The media’s Big Lie
Equally guilty of attempts to control the narrative is the so-called legacy media. This includes pretty much every major cable TV news outlet across America, as well as most big-city newspapers such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Chicago Sun-Times or any other large American city paper.
Think about the fact that for the past 5 years the legacy media’s reporting on Donald Trump has been 95% negative, despite his obvious success in dealing with economic and trade challenges, not to mention his most recent success with the Abraham Accords, which paves the way for peaceful coexistence between Israel and the Arab world.
It’s called lies of omission and is, to borrow a word from Google, “egregious.” While not everyone may find the President’s personality to their liking, he was duly elected and has enjoyed great success, as shown by the 75 million votes he received in November.
What the media “reports” is more often than not opinion or editorial. Real journalism appears to have gone by the wayside, as “reporters” often tell the public mistruths, distortions and lies by omission in order to make their point.
Fear Trump’s freedom
Rounding out this troika of connivance is the fact that we are in the midst of a pandemic, which is a crisis no government appears to be wasting. Lockdowns and conflicting regulations have the general population reeling as many are either scared witless, while others are watching their livelihood and their assets disappear.
It’s been pointed out repeatedly that the pandemic has a mortality rate of less than one 0.5%, the majority of those infected are asymptomatic and locking down entire states or provinces doesn’t work. But that isn’t the point. The point is to seize control.
If you can legislate/regulate people wearing masks, their ability to move freely and what they read, hear and see, then you own them. So now that we are all in the process of becoming slaves, welcome to the new endarkenment.
Klaus Rohrich — Bio and Archives

Klaus Rohrich is senior columnist for Canada Free Press. Klaus also writes topical articles for numerous magazines. He has a regular column on RetirementHomes and is currently working on his first book dealing with the toxicity of liberalism.  His work has been featured on the Drudge Report, Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, among others.  He lives and works in a small town outside of Toronto.

Older articles by Klaus Rohrich


“Let me be clear: Trump will be president for another four years.” Nye County Chairman, Nevada

You must take the time to read this whole document including Parts 1,2,3, otherwise
you will not put the whole picture together, those who loved Pence may have
a different opinion when you have read this.  Also listen to the PODCAST

With a total of 16,325 sq miles, Nye County, Nevada is the 3rd largest county by area in the contiguous United States. Home to 42,282 people, Nye County has a total of 21681 households earning 39876 on average per year. 7,962 Registered Democrats. 14,923 Registered Republicans. 31,407 Registered Voters.

A Letter from the Nye County Chairman

Update: some have asked why I didn’t sign my name to this post.  The answer is simple: the intended audience was our rural membership and they all know me.
As I write to you today, I have no doubt that this letter will find many of you crushed under the weight of despair or perhaps lost in a maze of confusion.
 It is my hope that by the time you finish reading this letter you will be able to confidently join millions of others who support the president and another four years. Let me be clear: Trump will be president for another four years.
Biden will not be president. Yes, I know those are shocking words in these crazy days.
I have been approached by many saying, “It’s over…” and “Trump conceded the election…”. Nothing of the sort has taken place. Go back and listen to the videos all the way through. At no point does Trump even mention Biden’s name. At no point does he say he concedes. He does say that there will be a peaceful transition to a new administration and he does say that this is only the beginning. Those phrases are important to note. Indeed, we will have a new administration made up of a new vice president and cabinet as the current ones have all made their treason complete. I will touch on this in more detail shortly.
We do well to remember that for more than four years Donald Trump has been five steps ahead of everyone in every attempt to derail him, impeach him, or confound him. For example, he announced on election night in the early hours of the morning that he “didn’t want a dump of ballots at 4AM.” What happened in just a few short hours at almost exactly 4AM? A huge ballot dump took place which showed that he already knew that it was going to take place. That was a public word to the enemies of our country that he was on to them. Also, consider the recent incident at the capitol building in DC. Trump was late to his speaking engagement and then spoke on a number of rehashed things to the crowd of 500K+ but this created a problem. You see, if Trump had spoken on time and briefly, the MAGA crowd would have been at the capitol building with the Antifa faction and likely would have been drawn into the fray by accident and confusion due to the crowd size. With Trump speaking late and long, the MAGA crowd was PROTECTED and SEPARATED from the Antifa groups. It would be very clear that the disguised Antifa people were 95%+ of the people in the building. Again, Trump countered because he was steps ahead of them. This was clearly a staged event meant to blame Trump supporters and try to frame Trump so the 25th amendment could be used by Congress but it failed. Never mind the numerous videos showing the police opening the gates for Antifa (they didn’t fight their way in) and then leading them throughout the building.  
I say all this as only two examples out of many that at no point has our president been in a fight of desperation.
Now you may ask, “Why hasn’t Trump arrested anyone yet? Why did this have to go all the way to Congress?” Multiple reasons:
  • first, Trump has been adamant in following the rule of law and the Constitution. He gives everyone, no matter how dirty, an opportunity to do the right thing (sometimes with warnings such as the phone call with the Georgia Secretary of State recently). He pushed cases through the courts, he presented evidence to the legislatures, and he even told the vice president to do the right thing.  But with the betrayal by Pence and Congress, the treason is now complete and nobody can say that Trump did not allow the process to finish before acting.
  • Second, in order to drain the swamp you have to know who are the swamp creatures. They can blend in very well with the crowds. But the false event in the capitol revealed the final traitors for who they were regardless of party affiliation. Trump flushed them out of hiding.
I need to take a moment to speak on Pence. With his treason completed, many of you may not know of his dealings and political posturing prior to the infamous day in the capitol. Pence was already wheeling and dealing way back during the 2016 election season with…wait for it….Paul Ryan. Remember Ryan? The RINO speaker of the house? Look at these emails that were recently revealed:
Pence-Ryan Emails
Pence was also involved with a scheme to oust Trump sometime during his first four years that was orchestrated by Rod Rosenstein and supported by the Clintons. The plan: get rid of Trump, Pence becomes president and then appoints Rod Rosenstein as the new VP. Why would they want that? Because they felt Pence could be controlled. See these links for the 3 part series for more information:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
More could be said but I don’t want this letter to become more of a book than it already is. Suffice it to say that when Trump said at the DC rally that he hoped Pence would do the right thing, he already knew what he was going to do but was, yet again, giving the man space to choose to do the right thing.
Now, nobody has been more supportive of Trump than Lin Wood. This man’s career has been fighting defamation lawsuits which means that he doesn’t say things, no matter how outrageous they may seem, without them being true as he knows the consequences of slander. With this in mind, Lin Wood has become a fountain of information and leaks of hitherto unknown information revealing some of the depths of corruption and evil in our highest offices. This is the same man who recently said that arrests are coming over the next few days. He called Pence a traitor well before the counting of the elector votes on the 6th. But did you know that he also said that the president, following the capitol incident, left DC on a “Doomsday” aircraft (used for communications in the event of a nuclear war) with his family and was in Abilene, TX. This aircraft was confirmed by both flight trackers and eyes on the ground. In short, he is a trustworthy source of information. If you have a means to follow Lin Wood on Parler, I would highly recommend that you do so to stay abreast of things taking place.  You can also listen to this podcast: Podcast 
So, what comes next? I don’t have the particulars but I can give you milestones to watch for as the coming days unfold:
  1. Expect the emergency broadcast system to be activated. The FCC just recently released a memorandum speaking to the requirements under Federal law to send messages from the president to the public. See this link
  2. Expect confusion. We are in a battle for our republic against elites that are attempting the very coup that they are accusing Trump of doing. In battle, there will be disinformation but know that plans are being fulfilled.
  3. Expect high profile arrests to take place over the next 12 days and at any time. You may wake one morning to find someone in high office is no longer there.
  4. Expect this to be a bumpy ride to the very end. This is not a television show where things are resolved in 45 minutes.  
  5. Expect more bombshell evidence to be released between now and Jan. 20th.
  6. Expect some sort of internet blackout or outage: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Gmail are likely going to be affected. If you don’t have alternate forms of communication established now, it would be a good idea to start forming them even if it’s just checking on your next door neighbors.  
  7. Expect Trump to be inaugurated on Jan 20th!
  8. Expect the executive order from 2018 and/or the Insurrection Act to be enacted. This DOES NOT mean martial law. Remember that we have been under a state of emergency since 2018 which gives the president many powers to act.
These things may happen out of the order listed and some may happen multiple times. As I have been watching closely, many things have been and are in play as we speak. Remember that Trump has not and will not give up. He actually takes his oath of office to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic very seriously. This is why they are so panicked in DC: they know that Trump will fight while Congress just rolls over.
I’ve mentioned this before but it bears repeating. None of us would have believed what we all now know except that Trump and his team have painstakingly taken the time to show the public. Want to show what Congress thinks of you? Highlight that the stimulus bill only sent $600 to each American but billions to other countries (payoffs, money laundering). Want to show the extent of collusion with the CCP at all levels of government? Bring multiple lawsuits against the election fraud from the local courts all the way to the Supreme Court which will show just how brazenly treasonous the judges are. Want the public to see how rigged the election system has been for many years? Present the evidence openly as we have seen. Even this week we have sworn testimony out of Italy that the Leonardo defense contractor used satellites to change the votes from our election in the USA from Italy. These Dominion voting machines were actively sending data to Germany, Serbia, China, Iran, and now Rome. This corruption is MUCH bigger than any of us expected but none of us would have believed it until now. This is why things seem to have taken so long.
Now, the American public is awake and ready to take back their long forgotten responsibilities to hold the elected officials accountable. I have heard from many of you how upset you are with the obvious and willful disregard for the truth and for justice.
As the days unfold, let’s maintain communications among ourselves and try to help our neighbor to understand what is happening. Turn off the television as they have demonstrated they are clearly only falsifying the media to maintain control over your thinking. Do not despair but pray for our country, for Trump and his supporters, and for a national repentance to be stirred nationwide.
The next 12 days will be something to tell the grandchildren! It’s 1776 all over again!

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp has been painfully bruised by the 2020 elections.

Georgia’s Gov. Kemp Under Fire After Senate Losses
brian kepm speaks at steps

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp speaks to the media during a press conference at the Georgia State Capitol on April 27, 2020 in Atlanta, Georgia. ( Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Saturday, 09 January 2021 09:15 AM

Even though he wasn’t on the ballot, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp has been painfully bruised by the 2020 elections.
In a state long dominated by Republicans, Democrats won Georgia’s electoral votes for president in November and two U.S. Senate seats in runoff elections Tuesday, defeating Kemp’s hand-picked Senate appointee. President Donald Trump, furious at Kemp for resisting efforts to overturn Trump’s election loss, vowed to oppose the governor’s reelection next year.
Trump loyalists are already working to recruit a primary challenger. Meanwhile, Democrats who have gained strength in Georgia since Stacey Abrams’ narrow 2018 loss to Kemp are spoiling for revenge.
“Gov. Kemp, you’re next. See you in 2022,” the Democratic Governors Association tweeted Wednesday as the upset victories of Democrats Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff in the Georgia Senate races came to light.
The governor’s political capital took a serious hit with the loss of Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler. A year ago, he chose the wealthy businesswoman and political novice to fill the seat vacated by retiring Sen. Johnny Isakson, in part to help Republicans win back support among suburban women. In doing so, he passed over more experienced contenders — including Trump’s personal choice, former GOP Rep. Doug Collins.
The gamble failed. And the defeats of both Loeffler and fellow Republican David Perdue handed control of the U.S. Senate to Democrats.
“Brian Kemp is the governor of the Titanic,” said Debbie Dooley, president of the Atlanta tea party and a Republican activist. “His governorship hit a big iceberg and it’s going down.
Rest of the story Click Here:

As president, Joe Biden could take action on hundreds of policies without having to go through Congress. The Biden-Sanders unity task force provides a road map.

The 277 Policies for Which Biden Need Not Ask Permission

As president, Joe Biden could take action on hundreds of policies without having to go through Congress. The Biden-Sanders unity task force provides a road map.

by July 28, 2020


Webmaster Comments below.

The majority of citizens who came to DC we normal Americans concerned about the direction of our country and to protest the the Electoral college.
They came on busses many from our central Florida area, the were dressed as normal people, did not being weapons, and were not the people who stormed the Capitol!
It was a known fact that ANTIFA had stated they were going to dress up as protestors and disguised as Trump protestors instead of wearing their normal cover.

Their actions were what gave them away, you have never seen conservatives do the actions that these terrorist did .Trump did nothing wrong at the rally, he only clarified what happened in the election, he did not direct people to advance on the capitol.

Yet the left wing press covers them and blames the peaceful protestors

So where does America stand now?

All legal cases that were being brought by the Durham investigation will be thrown out, no one again on the democrat side will pay for their crimes, the Borders are going to be opened, you can count on a million people to cross that Southern Border the day after Biden is sworn in, none of the fraud of this election will ever be resolved,  the democrats will control the U.S Government very possibly for Decades as they have perfected the process of completing Fraud elections.

By way, the left fake news press is going to cover for ANTIFA, they will put all the blame on Trump Conservatives.

Welcome to the start of Socialism!

Our Senate is totally useless, our Supreme Court no longer protects our Constitution, the Democrats will stack the court and make it even more worthless!

We have a vice president how was an Anchor Baby, neither one of Kamala Harris’s parents were ever citizens of the U.S at the time of her birth, one simple fact on immigration to become a citizen; You must reside in the U.S  as a Permeant Resident for five years,  to be eligible to apply for Naturalization, they were here 1960-1961  on Student visa’s which in that era did not grant Permanent citizenship. Kamala was born 1964, even a 2nd grader can add that up, and will not come up with 5 years.

So Called Legal Scholars who use the 14th Amendment to validate here Natural born status are totally wrong and have no idea what the 14th actually says.  It does not mention anywhere the issue of Natural Born Citizenship or the qualification to be the president, it states if you are born on American soil you are a Citizen, you have all the privilege’s of any American citizen, except you cannot run for the presidency. Our founders knew exactly what “Natural born meant with respect to the Constitution, our current day Lengel Scholars are totally ignorant!

Two Supreme Court cases have made statements that Natural born means born of parents who are citizen’s of the U.S.!

Also one of the creators of the 14th Amendment Rep. Bingham made the statement t0 the congressional meeting,  that Natural born meant what is stated “Born of parents who are Natural Born or Naturalized at the time of your birth”

You can check it out, do the research, prove me wrong beyond any doubt!

Comments are open, but don’t bother if you do not know the facts, they will be deleted.




Moms For America Call For Americans to Stand Up, Reject Evil and Marxism

Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) said to NTD that voter fraud needs investigation on Dec. 22, 2020. ( screenshot NTD)

Moms For America Call For Americans
to Stand Up, Reject Evil and Marxism

January 7, 2021 Updated: January 7, 2021
WASHINGTON—Multiple social figures called on the American people to stand up and oppose the evil and Marxism that have been infiltrating the United States, in the Save the Republic rally on Tuesday.
Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) told The Epoch Times in the rally that she hopes all the events will wake up the American people.
“My hope and dream is that it would wake America up to … the gravity of the place that we find ourselves both politically and morally in our society. And so I’m hoping that people will be awakened and get out of their passivity and find their place in this generation to serve,” Miller said.
Thousands attended the rally that the Moms for America, a grassroots organization, co-hosted in front of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday afternoon.
“As we have seen, evil has infiltrated all aspects of our society and Marxism has infiltrated all levels of our government. Darkness seems to surround us. That is not our vision of the future, and it is not the life we want for our children. We have, therefore, decided to stand up, speak up, and make sure our voices are heard!” Kimberly Fletcher, president of Moms for America, said a day prior to the legislators challenging the electoral votes of each state.
Miller said that if the Biden administration has its way, it will push its agenda, and “it will be oppressive.” They will open up the borders, stack the courts, stop energy production, get overly friendly with Iran and China, tax heavier, keep the country closed, and mandate masks, she said. “They’ve said out of their own mouths.”  Fletcher, a mother of eight and founder of Moms for America said that mothers have played a vital role in securing and protecting the Republic ever since the Mayflower landed 400 years ago.
“With the Constitution being subverted, election integrity in question, and the Republic hanging in the balance, mothers are once again rising up to save the Republic for our families, our freedoms, and our future,” Fletcher added.  Fletcher told The Epoch Times that it’s about their values, not Donald Trump.
“If Donald Trump was a socialist pro-abortion … we wouldn’t be supporting him. We support him because he supports us and our values,” she said. The United States is “so close to communism right now,” Fletcher said.  Fletcher does not take Joe Biden as the biggest threat, but instead, the deceived American people are the largest issue. “Our biggest threat are our neighbors who have bought into this.”
Fletcher expressed her appreciation to those legislators who are challenging the electoral votes and called them heroes who dared to stand up against opponents’ political retaliation.
Follow Emel on Twitter: @mlakan


The True Face of the Chinese Communist Party Has Been Exposed’

The Epoch Times

Secretary Pompeo: ‘The True Face of the
Chinese Communist Party Has Been Exposed’

January 4, 2021 Updated: January 5, 2021
In an interview with The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders” program, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo elucidated on the Trump administration’s efforts to reconnect modern America to its founding origins based on God-given rights and described the present administration’s foreign policy of keeping America safe from the worldwide threat of communism.  At the outset of the interview, host Jan Jekielek asked Pompeo why it took so long for the United States to sanction the Chinese Communist Party for gross human rights violations against practitioners of the meditation group Falun Gong.
“You go back all the way to Tiananmen Square. We’ve known the nature of this regime, and frankly, freedom-loving people across the world who have known the nature of authoritarian regimes throughout history. And yet we ignored it,” Pompeo answered.  Pompeo explained that the reason for the disregard of the CCP’s (Chinese Communist Party) grave human rights violations was a great extent due to the existence of a belief that if the United States engaged in fair and reciprocal trade and engagement, the situation would ameliorate, however, reality showed that the idea was clearly “false all the way through.”
Epoch Times PhotoSecretary of State Mike Pompeo at the State Department in Washington on Jan. 4, 2021. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
He continued to answer by saying that President Donald Trump understood the failure of that engagement policy from the outset and changed the American stance fundamentally, adding that it was not just the United States that has changed its view of China, but the whole West.
“Even when you look at Europe and Australia and Southeast Asia, they know to, they know that the Chinese Communist Party is up to no good.”
Pompeo added that while dissidents were sending out warnings about the CCP’s wrongdoings, the United States was involved in very serious counterterrorism operations and the focus was taken off the CCP.  “We took our eye off this enormous threat and now it’s now upon us. It’s now inside the gates, the Chinese Communist Party is here in America, and the Trump administration has begun in every dimension to turn the ship in the right direction, to get America to once again do the right thing and protect itself from this communist threat in China.”
Pompeo was then asked why he has been more focused on religious freedom than any other Secretary of State.
“It’s at the center of every civilization, this idea that human beings have inherent dignity because of their humanness. And if you get that piece wrong, bad things flow from that.”
Pompeo said that under Trump’s leadership, they have focused on religious freedom not just in China but particularly with the CCP.
“We’ve seen what they’re doing to the Uyghurs in the western part of the country. We’ve seen what they’ve done to Tibetans. We now see them doing the same thing to other ethnic minorities, including the people in Mongolia and the north part of China. And then Christians throughout the entire country,” Pompeo said.  “These things that are fundamental affronts to human dignity are something that is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes and General Secretary Xi Jinping is no different. He knows that he has to extend ever-increasing power and control in order to maintain his capacity to rule. And that shuts out the important space that religious freedom should have for every human being in the world,” he continued.
Screens that read 5G Clean PathScreens that read 5G Clean Path with a map of the United States are visible behind Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, accompanied by State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus (L), as he speaks at a news conference at the State Department in Washington, on April 29, 2020. (Andrew Harnik/AFP via Getty Images)
Pompeo said the administration has done their best to shine a light on these violations and is confident that: “The world will keep up this drumbeat, demanding simply that the Chinese Communist Party permit people to exercise their God-given rights to practice, and not practice their faith in the way that they so choose.”
He explained why he has emphasized a clear difference between the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese people, explaining that the people who live there are good but are sadly “under the jackboot of an authoritarian regime.”
“Chinese people who live all across the world, including here in the United States of America, we want to honor them, and we admire them. And we hope that they too will join the call to change the nature of how this regime behaves in its international activities,” Pompeo said.  Pompeo clarified that people around the world are now seeing more clearly that the CCP is up to no good, “I’m confident that this pressure that is now on the Chinese Communist Party is real. And not just because leaders are demanding it, because people all across the world can see it, the true face of the Chinese Communist Party has been exposed.”
Trading with China fairly or having Chinese students in the United States is not a problem, he said, as long as they don’t break rules that would compromise American security or freedom.  Pompeo stated the reason for his distrust of the CCP: “Every experience I’ve had, in my six years as a member of Congress, in now four years serving in the Trump administration, would suggest that anything but distressing anything that comes from the Chinese Communist Party, is folly. They’ve broken promise after promise after promise.”
At the last section of the interview, he was asked about the importance of the Commission on Unalienable Rights (pdf).
He explained that it is about reconnecting to the idea upon which the United States was founded—the intrinsic and natural God-given rights that were provided to humans and recognized by the Founding Fathers, not created by them.  “It reminds us of the greatness of America and how smart and capable our founders were and why that is so central to the successes that our nation has had,” Pompeo said, “I wanted to get us back to that tradition.”
Follow Jan on Twitter: @JanJekielek

2020: The Year of the Big Fraud


Facebook Join My List Logo

American Thinker

 2020: The Year of the Big Fraud

By Clarice Feldman
This was a year in which a number of frauds were exposed: Election fraud, media fraud, and public health fraud, among them. Their exposure has stirred outrage and as the year ends, no relief seems in sight.
Election Fraud With No Apparent Judicial Relief
Many Americans — according to some surveys, a majority — believe that the presidential election was marred by massive fraud in five states without which the President would surely have been re-elected.
The short version of this disbelief in the integrity of the election results is this by Kenekoa the Great on the unrealistic belief that the frail, corrupt Joe Biden won:
When you win a record low 17% of counties, lose Black & Hispanic support, lose 18/19 Bellwether Counties, lose Ohio, Florida, & Iowa — and lose 27/27 House “Toss-Ups” — but you shatter the popular vote record
Peter Navarro has a longer version:
“Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage,” the report claims.
Additionally, the report cites affidavits alleging the exploitation of the elderly and the infirm by “effectively hijacking their identities and votes” and accuses Democrats of using the coronavirus pandemic to relax voter ID requirements to the point that ballot harvesting and fraud could slip by unnoticed.
The report outlined incidents in the key states of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where ballots allegedly were illegally harvested and dumped into drop boxes.
The election was marred with examples of dead people voting, according to the report.
“In Pennsylvania, for example, a statistical analysis conducted by the Trump Campaign matching voter rolls to public obituaries found what appears to be over 8,000 confirmed dead voters successfully casting mail-in ballots,” the report claims. “In Georgia — underscoring the critical role any given category of election irregularities might play in determining the outcome — the estimated number of alleged deceased individuals casting votes almost exactly equals the Biden victory margin.”
The report concludes: “The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.”
None of this evidence has been rejected by any court; all have refused to consider it citing a variety of jurisdictional hurdles.
Americans should know how perilous their democracy has become. The majority of Donald Trump’s voters already believe the presidential election was rigged, and there is no doubt that suspect voting changes, attributed to the requirements of voting in a pandemic, have created large anomalies in five states that made a great many such votes impossible to authenticate. Untold numbers of ballots arrived at a time and in a manner that incites the inference that they were substantially fraudulent. The numbers of votes involved in Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are undoubtedly adequately numerous to have influenced the election.
The courts have failed to address the questions raised by this disturbing pattern of votes confined to only five states. [snip]
The refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the appeal from the state of Texas, joined by 18 other states, is an outright abdication. Of course, Texas and its co-petitioners have perfectly adequate standing to demand that all states, in choosing a president, conduct their elections credibly enough to assure the whole country that the Constitution has been followed in filling the nation’s highest offices. For the Supreme Court to take the position, as it did, that it could not hear the election challenge case because Texas and the others did not have the standing to challenge how another state conducts its presidential election is completely spurious in the circumstances. Where the courts don’t exercise their jurisdiction, a vacuum arises which is likely to be filled by lawlessness, and potentially, even violent lawlessness.
The United States has become a country where a majority of Americans—people of good will from both parties — believe presidential elections are not conducted honestly.
As Daniel Greenfield details, not only did the Supreme Court abdicate any judicial responsibility for hearing the contested election cases, so have lower courts.
When should you file a lawsuit over an election? If you are a Democrat, the answer is at any time. But if you are a Republican the answer is never. [snip] You can sue over how an election was handled in 2018, and get a decision in 2020, but you can’t sue over an election in 2020. Not if you are a Republican.There’s no standing to sue over an election before it happens because then it’s speculative; theories of potential future injury, nor can you sue while an election is underway. Because, come on, it’s already underway.We’re not on the eve of an election; we’re in the middle of it, noted Charlene S. McGowan, counsel for Georgia’s Office of the Attorney General. And then it’s too late to sue afterward. But speaking of who gets to sue, here’s who gets to sue when it comes to the Democrats. The federal lawsuit was initiated by freelance journalist Greg Palast along with Helen Butler, executive director of Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda.F reelance journalists can sue over 2018 elections, but Republicans, no matter how clearly they can show injury, can’t sue over the 2020 election.
This leaves the only remaining avenue to affect the genuine choice of the people to the Congress when it must vote on the selection of electors, a procedure clearly permitted by the Constitution. Will they have the courage to do the right thing? If they don’t, we will see fraudulent elections forever with no judicial redress. In almost none of the counties whose votes are disputed was the Dominion system examined. In Maricopa County Arizona the vote officials are refusing to honor a subpoena to provide the machines for examination. In the only county where they have been examined (Antrim, Michigan) the analyst who audited the system reports that the machines flipped Trump votes to Biden.
It has been particularly galling to me that Facebook clipped hundreds of ”go vote” messages on my page, while parking its fat finger on reliable articles on vote fraud, censoring them or warning readers away, citing fact checks written by youngsters who themselves dissembled and misrepresented.
Media Fraud
This partisan fraud has been ongoing for at least two decades but is no longer escaping the attention of great deal of its erstwhile consumer base. For years we have been examining media disinformation and bias. This year it was particularly evident in the media’s discrediting the accurate reports of Hunter Biden’s corruption (and that of his father and uncle, who also benefited from it).
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters think many news organizations ignored the Hunter Biden story to help his father’s presidential campaign. Thirty-two percent (32%) disagree and say they ignored it because they felt it was a partisan hit job. Seventeen percent (17%) are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Fifty-six percent (56%) believe it is likely Joe Biden was consulted about and perhaps profited from his son’s overseas business deals including at least one involving a company in mainland China. This includes 43% who say it’s Very Likely. This is little changed from late October. Thirty-eight percent (38%) still consider this connection unlikely, with 22% who say it’s Not At All Likely.
Now that Hunter Biden has acknowledged publicly that he is under criminal investigation for tax evasion, many major news organizations like the New York Times and CNN are covering his questionable overseas business dealings, first reported several weeks before Election Day by the New York Post.
Seventy percent (70%) of voters say they have been closely following news reports about Hunter Biden’s business dealings, with 38% who have been following Very Closely.
Among those who have been following Very Closely, 76% say the media deliberately ignored the story before Election Day to help Joe Biden, and 72% think the president-elect is likely to have been consulted about and perhaps profited from his son’s overseas dealings.
Add to this the media’s refusal to accurately describe the months-long BLM/Antifa riots, looting, arson, and killing, calling it instead “mostly peaceful protests,” it’s no wonder people are tuning them out. The heavy hand of the left wing played its part. Internet giants like Twitter suspended the account of the oldest newspaper in the country, the NY Post, which broke the story of the Biden family corruption with China, Russia, and the Ukraine as well as the account of the White House press secretary, and you can understand why “fewer than 15 percent of Americans trust the media.”
Treat your pen like a Democratic party weapon and be rewarded with pink slips to the unemployment line. “An estimated 28,637 job cuts were reported in the industry by late October, Variety, citing data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, reported, nearly as many as the record 28,803 reported in the media sector in 2008. By comparison, the sector saw just over 10,000 job losses in 2019 and 15,474 in 2018.” The Hill attributes it to the China Virus. I think the mendacity and patent bias also has a great deal to do with the shrinking media employment.
2020: The Public Health Fraud
It was impossible to overlook the failures of the CDC (Center for Disease Control) to garner our respect. The Center’s constant shifting of advice based on little empirical evidence was maddening enough. Between the CDC and Dr. Fauci, we had a year of Simon Says. Worse was their obvious hypocrisy of condoning the “mostly peaceful protests” by thousands of people closely massed, often maskless, shouting and singing (and spraying droplets all about) while the rest of us who work and pay their salaries and unemployment benefits were in home confinement, deprived of normal entertainment, socialization, education, rent payments, work opportunities, and spiritual gatherings.
This week was the capper. Due to incredible management by the President and Vice-President, vaccines were developed to deal with the virus and are on their way. One assumed that the first to be offered a chance to get it would be those most vulnerable to the virus — the elderly. But, no — per the New York Times, the CDC wants the first shots to go to the frailest of the elderly and health care workers, but from there the allocation is being debated. Is the vaccine to prevent deaths or to reduce transmission? Is it to redress imagined privilege if we emphasize the latter? The CDC chose to de-emphasize the elderly as a group because “older populations are whiter…. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”
The authors of the article, Abby Goodnough and Jan Hoffman, acknowledge there is some disagreement with using the vaccine to “level the playing field”:
Still, some people believe it is wrong to give racial and socioeconomic equity more weight than who is most likely to die.
“They need to have bombproof, fact-based, public-health-based reasons for why one group goes ahead of another,” said Chuck Ludlam, a former Senate aide and biotech industry lobbyist who protested putting essential workers ahead of older people in comments to the committee. “They have provided no explanation here that will withstand public scrutiny.”
Pesky of Mr. Ludlam to insist on medical reasons for providing priorities for limited supplies of medical aid.
The debate by those in the field provides some shocking admissions. Marc Lipshits argues teachers should not be considered essential workers who would get priority for the vaccine. “Teachers have middle-class salaries, are very often white, and they have college degrees,” he said. “Of course, they should be treated better, but they are not among the most mistreated of workers.”
Elise Gould says they should be, but only because they serve minorities: “When you talk about disproportionate impact and you’re concerned about people getting back into the labor force, many are mothers, and they will have a harder time if their children don’t have a reliable place to go,” she said. “And if you think generally about people who have jobs where they can’t telework, they are disproportionately Black and Brown. They’ll have more of a challenge when child care is an issue.”
Last I saw, children are not very high spreaders of the virus. I should think that, not the racial makeup of the teaching force or the students, should be determinant of whether teachers are essential workers. But then again, it’s my understanding that the people most vulnerable to death from the virus are elderly black people, whom people like Gould would not give priority to. Even lefty Matthew Iglesias thinks this is idiotic.
Last but by no means least, note the weird race craft here. We know the people who’ve been dying the most from Covid are black senior citizens. The decision here is to not prioritize them, but to instead vaccinate a different, less vulnerable group of people and then assert that this creates some kind of abstract collective racial benefit. There have been a lot of takes lately about woke liberals prioritizing symbolic racial issues over the concrete needs of non-white people, but this idea really takes the cake.
Reprinted from American Thinker
Communications Director
Legal Immigrants for America

According to Pelosi and the 117 Congress, it is now inappropriate to ask a Democratic representative how their “daughter” or “son” is doing

  January 4, 2021

117th Congressional Rules Package Eliminates ‘Gendered Language’ Like ‘Father’ And ‘Daughter’

House of Representatives leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Representative James McGovern have brought gender identity to the Congressional floor. On Friday, House leaders announced, “the Rules Package for 117th Congress includes a proposal to replace gendered language referring to a representative’s family members with gender-neutral terms” reported the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Apparently, it is now inappropriate to ask a Democratic representative how their “daughter” or “son” is doing. McGovern’s announcement stated that the resolution would change “pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender-neutral or removes references to gender, as appropriate, to ensure we are inclusive of all Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners and their families – including those who are nonbinary.”

Specifics include changing references to fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives and sons-in-law to be changed to “parent, child, sibling, spouse, or parent-in-law.” Instead of aunt or uncle, stepparents, and siblings-in-law, extended family will be referred to as “child’s parent.”

Other changes include using “seafarers” instead of “seamen,” “chair” instead of “chairman” and instead of “submit his or her resignation” it will simply be “resigns.” The rules package is to be voted on when the new Congress assembles. The package also includes reforms to ethics, accountability and inclusion.

Pelosi is thrilled with the proposal, stating, “Thanks to the leadership of Chairman McGovern and our Members, Democrats have crafted a package of unprecedented, bold reforms, which will make the House more accountable, transparent and effective in our work to meet the needs of the American people.”

As the Daily Caller points out, Pelosi still has “mother” and “grandmother” in her  Twitter bio. How insulting!

Roger Stone Rallies Masses Near Rick Scott’s Home, Demanding He Objects JAN 6 Electoral Votes •Jan 4, 2021

Pence Welcomes Efforts by Lawmakers to Object to Electoral College Votes

The Epoch Times

Vice President Mike Pence in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, on Nov. 13, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)
Vice President Mike Pence in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, on Nov. 13, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

Pence Welcomes Efforts by Lawmakers to Object to Electoral College Votes on Jan. 6: Report

January 2, 2021 Updated: January 2, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence said he welcomes efforts by lawmakers to challenge Electoral College results in the upcoming congressional joint session on Jan. 6, when the votes are formally counted, according to a statement sent by his chief of staff to reporters.
Vice President Chief of Staff Marc Short issued the statement on Saturday saying that Pence, who will be presiding over the Jan. 6 session as president of the senate, is open to considering planned objections by Republican House members and senators to Electoral College votes cast for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Short added that the vice president also welcomes efforts by lawmakers to present evidence of election irregularities and alleged voter fraud before Congress during that session.
“Vice President Pence shares the concerns of millions of Americans about voter fraud and irregularities in the last election,” Short said in the statement sent to media outlets.
This comes after a group of 11 Republican senators announced their intention to challenge the electoral college votes from contested states earlier on Saturday. The group, led by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), said the 2020 election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations, and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.”
The allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election “exceed any in our lifetimes,” they said, adding that this “deep distrust” of U.S. democratic processes “will not magically disappear” and “should concern us all,” whether or not elected officials or journalist believe the allegations.
“It poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations,” the senators wrote in their statement, while calling on Congress to appoint an electoral commission to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election results.
They added that they intend to object to the votes unless and until the emergency 10-day audit is completed.
The group includes Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.). Meanwhile, Sens.-elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) also plan on joining. They’ll be sworn in on Sunday, several days before the joint session.
Their announcement means 12 senators intend to object to the contested electoral votes on Jan. 6.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) was the first senator to announce his plans to object earlier this week. Forty House members plan on objecting to electoral votes, according to a tally by The Epoch Times.
Objections during the joint session must be made in writing by at least one House member and one senator. If the objection for any state meets this requirements, the joint session pauses and each house withdraws to its own chamber to debate the question for a maximum of two hours. The House and the Senate then vote separately to accept or reject the objection, which requires a majority vote from both chambers.
If both candidates receive less than 270 electoral votes on Jan. 6, then a contingent election is triggered in which each state’s delegation in the U.S. House of Representatives casts one en bloc vote to determine the president, while the vice president is decided by a vote in the U.S. Senate.
Democrats and several Republican senators have opposed the plans to challenge the electoral college results. Republican Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) issued statements on Saturday to reaffirm their support that they would back the electoral college votes that were cast for Biden.
Similarly, Senate Democrats rebuked efforts by their Republican colleagues.
“Joe Biden will be inaugurated on January 20th, and no publicity stunt will change that,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said in a statement.
“This pathetic, opportunistic stunt is an attack on our democracy. It’s un-American & unconscionable. Votes have been counted, recounted, certified, & all challenges totally discredited. Time to govern & get things done,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said in a separate statement.
The Republican senators acknowledged in their statement on Saturday that they expect Democrats and a few Republicans to vote against them but they added that “support for election integrity should not be a partisan issue.”
“A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20 would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People,” the Republican senators said.
This comes after many President Donald Trump allies called on Pence to reject electoral votes from disputed states. A judge on Friday rejected a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and other Republicans against Pence requesting that the court grant the vice president “the exclusive authority and sole discretion in determining which electoral votes to count for a given State” on Jan. 6.
Zachary Stieber contributed to this report.
Follow Janita on Twitter: @janitakan

Why I will not accept Joe Biden as President

Newt Gingrich: Why I will NOT accept
Joe Biden as president

The Right Scoop • 322 COMMENTS

Newt Gingrich wrote an op-ed this week explaining why he will not accept Joe Biden as president. Here’s part of what he said and it’s not as much about the election as some might think:
WASHINGTON TIMES – In 2016, I supported an outsider candidate, who was rough around the edges and in the Andrew Jackson school of controversial assaults on the old order. When my candidate won, it was blamed on the Russians. We now know (four years later) Hillary Clinton’s own team financed the total lie that fueled this attack.
Members of the FBI twice engaged in criminal acts to help it along — once in avoiding prosecution of someone who had deleted 33,000 emails and had a subordinate use a hammer to physically destroy hard drives, and a second time by lying to FISA judges to destroy Gen. Michael Flynn and spy on then-candidate Donald Trump and his team. The national liberal media aided and abetted every step of the way. All this was purely an attempt to cripple the new president and lead to the appointment of a special counsel — who ultimately produced nothing.
Now, people in my world are told it is time to stop resisting and cooperate with the new president. But we remember that the Democrats wanted to cooperate with Mr. Trump so much that they began talking about his impeachment before he even took office. The Washington Post ran a story on Democrat impeachment plots the day of the inauguration.
In fact, nearly 70 Democratic lawmakers boycotted his inauguration. A massive left-wing demonstration was staged in Washington the day after, where Madonna announced she dreamed of blowing up the White House to widespread applause. These same forces want me to cooperate with their new president. I find myself adopting the Nancy Pelosi model of constant resistance. Nothing I have seen from Mr. Biden since the election offers me any hope that he will reach out to the more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump.
So, I am not reacting to the votes so much as to the whole election environment.
When Twitter and Facebook censored the oldest and fourth largest newspaper (founded by Alexander Hamilton) because it accurately reported news that could hurt Mr. Biden’s chances — where were The New York Times and The Washington Post?
The truth of the Hunter Biden story is now becoming impossible to avoid or conceal. The family of the Democrat nominee for president received at least $5 million from an entity controlled by our greatest adversary. It was a blatant payoff, and most Americans who voted for Mr. Biden never heard of it — or were told before the election it was Russian disinformation. Once they did hear of it, 17% said they would have switched their votes, according to a poll by the Media Research Center. That’s the entire election. The censorship worked exactly as intended.
Typically, newspapers and media outlets band together when press freedom is threatened by censorship. Where was the sanctimonious “democracy dies in darkness?” Tragically, The Washington Post is now part of the darkness.

The election process itself was the final straw in creating the crisis of confidence which is accelerating and deepening for many millions of Americans.

Aside from a constant stream of allegations of outright fraud, there are some specific outrages — any one of which was likely enough to swing the entire election.

Officials in virtually every swing state broke their states’ own laws to send out millions of ballots or ballot applications to every registered voter. It was all clearly documented in the Texas lawsuit, which was declined by the U.S. Supreme Court based on Texas’ procedural standing — not the merits of the case. That’s the election.

In addition, it’s clear that virtually every swing state essentially suspended normal requirements for verifying absentee ballots. Rejection rates were an order of magnitude lower than in a normal year. In Georgia, rejection rates dropped from 6.5% in 2016 to 0.2% in 2020. In Pennsylvania, it went from 1% in 2016 to .003% in 2020. Nevada fell from 1.6% to .75%. There is no plausible explanation other than that they were counting a huge number of ballots — disproportionately for Mr. Biden — that normally would not have passed muster. That’s the election.

Newt details more in his op-ed that he finds incredibly disturbing, but here is how he ends it:

For more than four years, the entire establishment mobilized against the elected president of the United States as though they were an immune system trying to kill a virus. Now, they are telling us we are undermining democracy.

You have more than 74 million voters who supported President Trump despite everything — and given the election mess, the number could easily be significantly higher. The truth is tens of millions of Americans are deeply alienated and angry.

If Mr. Biden governs from the left — and he will almost certainly be forced to — that number will grow rapidly, and we will win a massive election in 2022.

Given this environment, I have no interest in legitimizing the father of a son who Chinese Communist Party members boast about buying. Nor do I have any interest in pretending that the current result is legitimate or honorable. It is simply the final stroke of a four-year establishment-media power grab. It has been perpetrated by people who have broken the law, cheated the country of information, and smeared those of us who believe in America over China, history over revisionism, and the liberal ideal of free expression over cancel culture.

I write this in genuine sorrow, because I think we are headed toward a serious, bitter struggle in America. This extraordinary, coordinated four-year power grab threatens the fabric of our country and the freedom of every American.

Newt is as brilliant as they come and laid this out in a way that I believe is very compelling. As he said in his closing, the election was simply a final stroke in a game Democrats and their media defenders have been playing for the last four years. They couldn’t get Trump with the Mueller report. They couldn’t get Trump with the Ukraine call and they couldn’t impeach him. The last resort was to use the pandemic against him and even that didn’t work. So they used the pandemic as a front to steal the election with mail-in ballots, something Trump had long said would be the case, and not even the Supreme Court would step in to stop the steal. And yet, as they’ve been doing since November 3rd, the media and Democrats are now demanding that we all bend down and kiss Joe Biden’s ring, as if everything is legitimate about his ‘victory’ and the last four years of trying to destroy Trump never happened.
I stand with Newt! Read the full op-ed here.

John Nelson - jenkan04@gmail.com
Bob Gilmore
Dick Fankhauser

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com