February 2017
« Oct    
PAYPAL Donations

The The Highlands Tea Party relies on your generous donations to keep the candle of liberty burning while we work tirelessly to reign in our out of control government, educate our Patriots on the latest issues, The HIghlands Tea party is a non-profit organization financed primarily by its members and through Raffles. We have no special interest funding our efforts. Your donations make a difference. Donations are not tax-deductible. Please consider a monthly donation; click on the PayPal Button to contribute with PayPal if you have an existing PayPal account or by credit card if you do not have a PayPal account. Please send checks to the address below, PayPal a protected transaction site used around the world. Donating by PayPal is Safe and Convenient

Send Checks to: The Highlands Tea Party 4196 Smoke signal Sebring, FL 33872

All donations are greatly appreciated, Thank You & God Bless My God! How little do my countrymen know what precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no other people on earth enjoy! ~Thomas Jefferson

General information

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Obama Coup D’état – Gen. Flynn’s Leaker Will Be Caught, 1501 – This HAS to be watched by everyone concerned about what is happening in the Intelligence community.

This is not just a Coup D’etat, this is designed to not just
delegitimize President Trump, it is designed to 
create the
atmosphere for impeachment, and for other legal
stratagem’s to destroy his presidency.

Published on Feb 16, 2017
Joseph DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, is one of the most powerful attorneys in Washington, and probably THE most powerful attorney that our team can completely trust.

I completely missed this before, but 3 days before the election, on Nov. 5th, in one of my favorite and most trustworthy news sources, the Daily Caller, he predicted that there would be no indictments concerning the Clinton Foundation from the Obama Justice Department.
“We now have the most politically corrupt Justice Department in the last 100 years.”

DiGenova, who is probably the favorite attorney to whom FBI agents would go to discuss their options in the Obama/Clinton world of infinite corruption, was the first to say that FBI agents refused direct orders from the top to destroy evidence in the form of the laptops of Clinton aides Heather Samuelson and Cheryl Mills in an agreed immunity deal.

He was outraged that the Justice Dept. had ordered the destruction:
“That alone is grounds for removal of every single person at the top of the Justice Department and any lawyer who agreed to that arrangement.”

That incriminating evidence is still out there – still awaiting to be dealt with.
But today, DiGenova – like President Trump – is much more worried about the powerful forces behind such an order trying to manipulate the MSM into impeaching President Trump.
I mean, they maneuvered to give Obama the Nobel Prize before he’d done anything, why not impeach President Trump before he’s done anything.

DiGenova’s brief yet powerful appearance on Hannity last night is a sober reminder of the high-stakes, but deadly serious games that are being played by Obama, Clinton, and other globalists like billionaire financier George Soros. We have got to pay attention.
If you send out nothing else today to your friends and family, please, please do whatever you can to spread this ultra-urgent message from US Attorney, Joe DiGenova:

Visit our website at http://www.billstill.com
Considered by informed insiders’ as the ultimate resource for surviving economic or financial collapse/crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about the latest US and world news, current events in Washington, and today’s United States political climate. Please Like, Comment & Share.

Good evening, I’m still reporting on
Obama Coup D’état – Gen. Flynn’s Leaker Will Be Caught

Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos and is the host of his wildly popular daily YouTube Channel the “Still Report”, the quintessential report on the economy and Washington.

WHO IS “US” An explanation for our Progressive Socialist – (DSA) Democratic Socialist of America

“US” – 
by Paul Genova

 I’m noticing that a lot of you aren’t graciously accepting the fact that your candidate lost. 
In fact you seem to be posting even more hateful things about those of us who voted for Trump. 
Some of you are apparently “triggered” because you are posting how sick” you feel about 
the results. How did this happen you ask?
Ø     You created “us” when you attacked our freedom of speech. 
Ø     You created “us” when you attacked our right to bear arms.
Ø     You created “us” when you attacked our Christian beliefs. 
Ø     You created “us” when you constantly referred to us as racists. 
Ø     You created “us” when you constantly called us xenophobic. 
Ø     You created “us” when you told us to get on board or get out of the way.
Ø     You created “us” when you forced us to buy health care and then financially penalized us for not participating.
Ø     You created “us” when you lied and said we could keep our insurance plans and our doctors. 
Ø     You created “us” when you allowed our jobs to continue to leave our country. 
Ø     You created “us” when you attacked our flag.
Ø     You created “us” when you took God out of our schools.
Ø     You created “us” when you confused women’s rights with feminism. 
Ø     You created “us” when you began to emasculate men.
Ø     You created “us” when you decided to make our children soft.
Ø     You created “us” When you decided to rewrite school history books and remove the truth about our founders 
Ø     You created “us” when you decided to vote for progressive ideals. 
Ø     You created “us” when you attacked our way of life. 
Ø     You created “us” when you decided to let our government get out of control. 
Ø     You created “us” the silent majority. You created “us” when you began murdering innocent law enforcement officers. 
Ø     You created “us” when you took a knee, or stayed seated or didn’t remove your hat during our National Anthem. 

And we became fed up, and we pushed back and spoke up. 

Ø     And we did it with ballots, not bullets. 
Ø     With ballots, not riots. 
Ø     With ballots, not looting. 
Ø     With ballots, not blocking traffic.
Ø     With ballots, not fires, except the one you 
started inside of “us”.
Ø      “YOU” created “US”.   It really is just that simple.

Really Number 12? Would think more like 40th – This is a JOKE right? But then look at who did the Poll!

RIDICULOUS: Leftist Professors Rank Obama #12 President Of All Time

In C-Span’s Presidential Historians’ Survey, which is conducted every four years after the presidential election to rank the 43 men who have served as President of the United States, the leftist bent of the historians was again on full display.
The historians ranked FDR third after the obvious choices of Abraham Lincoln and Geroge Washington ranked first and second respectively. One wonders why FDR occupies that exalted position, which he has held in the last two surveys, since in his twelve-year reign his policies extended the Great Depression until the advent of World War II, but he was in charge during that historic war, so there are mitigating factors.
But the historians actually ranked the failed presidencies of JFK and Barack Obama very high on the list; JFK, was ranked #8; Obama, #12. Incredibly, JFK, who saw the Soviet Union only gain in power during his presidency, was ranked ahead of Ronald Reagan, who brought the Soviet Union to its knees, Reagan ranked #9.   Obama at #12, surpassed James Monroe, the only man who was so successful that in his second election he won virtually a unanimous vote in the Electoral College, only missing the vote of William Plumer, a former U.S. senator and New Hampshire governor who voted for Secretary of State John Quincy Adams.
According to CNN:
C-SPAN’s academic advisers asked 91 presidential historians to rate each president from one to 10 on presidential leadership: “Public Persuasion,” “Crisis Leadership,” “Economic Management,” “Moral Authority,” “International Relations,” “Administrative Skills,” “Relations with Congress,” “Vision/Setting An Agenda,” “Pursued Equal Justice for All,” and “Performance Within the Context of His Times.”
Well, then, how can there be any doubt about Obama’s high ranking? After all, his crisis leadership gave us Benghazi and the invasion of Ukraine, his economic management left the U.S. with a labor participation rate matching the lowest labor participation rate in almost 40 years; his moral authority gave us the duplicity behind the Iran nuclear deal; his international relations left the entire Middle east aflame and ISIS ascendant; his relations with Congress were so bad that Politicotitled a story, “Obama, GOP Congress near end of long, ugly relationship”; his vision led to a bitterly divided American society over race; and his idea of pursuing justice for all was tinted against police officers rather than those who vilified them.


Leftists Keep Changing the Name

We currently have 51 House members and 14 Senators all with strong, documented Communist ties. As Trevor said, while these people couldn’t pass the FBI investigation necessary to become a janitor at Fort Hood, the fact that they won an election (often through fraud and voter manipulation), means that they were able to walk right through the front door of our government. They now hold the levers of power controlling taxes, the military, national security, the border, education, etc. They dictate government policy and their goal is antithetical to the America created under the Constitution. Rather than being a government of limited powers, they are working to create a government of absolute powers.

This is what the Group Indivisible is going to lead the country too; no more town halls

N.J. rep. says town halls ‘hijacked’

ASBURY PARK, N.J. — Add a New Jersey lawmaker to a growing list of House Republicans not interested in holding town halls and the risk of disruptions by anti-Trump and pro-Obamacare protesters.   Rep. Tom MacArthur says his town hall schedule is on hold because he doesn’t “want to be baited into having an event that some outside group can just make a spectacle out of.’’
MacArthur during a one-hour telephone town hall Monday night alleged that colleagues had their events disrupted by “hundreds of people have been bused in and have been organized and in some cases have even been paid to disrupt and to steal your voice.”  MacArthur didn’t offer evidence that protesters are paid and bused. Staffers did not respond to a request for a comment.  “I think you have to realize what’s going on all over the country. Public town hall events are being hijacked by groups that are outside of the district that (the) member represents. You’ve seen them on TV,’’ MacArthur said.
New York Rep. Chris Collins and Illinois Rep. Peter Roskam, both Republicans, earlier on Monday also said they don’t have plans to do any in-person town halls because of the current hostile climate.     MSN – Read On>>>>>

Commentary by WebMaster

Indivisible a Counter Trump movement, trying to desperately create themselves in the Image of the Tea Party are going to
eventually put a stop to town Hall meetings.  What does that that gain anyone when they cannot hear their representative speak?
this is a group out to start physical confrontations  among the peacefully assembled, they eve go so far in their documentation that the TEa party
  • Ignored reality and made up their ownI guess the do not consider the U.S Constitution and the Declaration Independence real documents or facts.
  • Threaten anyone the considered as enemy – Sorry, we have as a nationwide organization never threatened anyone or group, there is no proof of any such action.  This is an outright LIE
  • Physically assaulted and spat on staff – This Is an Outright LIE  – Not one incident has ever been proven
  • Shouted obscenities and burned people in effigyAgain an outright lie, this has never happened in a tea party rally and there has never been a effigy or flag burning.
  • Targeted their hate not just at congress , but also at fellow citizens (especially people of color)Another outright lie.
     Technically what they have described above is exactly what they are going to be; a compilation Occupy. BLM, Moveon.org and any other hate groups out there that George Soros has created and financed, they say they are not finance by anyone lBS.S.! They cannot afford to do what they are doing with out funds..
They have absolutely no documentation, video nothing to back up these absurd statements they have made about the Tea Party. We hold peaceful assemblies, clean up after ourselves, Peaceful meetings, flag waves show our patriotism of our country,  our signs have always been respectful never about race, no foul language, and I do not believe you will finds one congressman who would say that the tea party was in hospital as this group is stating they are going to be.
There is a book out that shows pictures of over a 12000 rallies held by tea parties across the country , Rallies held at state capitols, U.S Capitol, nowhere will you see a dirty foul language sign, or mention of race, now slang detrimental statements  Personally I predict this group is going to go the same way as Occupy, BLM, Moveon.org, people will ignore them as just more disruptive left wingers wanting to push a Socialist agenda on America.
I say , why don’t they collectively  get themselves passports, move to Russia and live the lifestyle that they so badly want; give up their U.S citizenship, we will not miss them!






Great Point for Walls and Gates

God had rules, and fortifications, to guard and protect a moral society from those unfit to enter.

It also reminds us of :

The Wall of Jerico was erected to keep out dangerous elements.
The American Western forts employed walls for protection.
The Native Americans set up tepees in a circle to protect against attack.

The American pioneers circled their wagons.
The Chinese built a famous wall to protect against dangerous outsiders.
The Israeli had to finally build their wall to help prevent terrorists from entering.
The Walls and protection within gated communities to protect against danger
The Americans & South Korean’s built a Wall (fence barrier) to keep out North Korea

Nation’s need walls barriers on their borders to keep out not just the bad,
but those who choose not to obey the immigration laws
A Nation has a right to know who enters their country 

9th Circuit progressive socialist “Black-Robed Bastards

This may be in the context of immigration, but it speaks to the broader point:
The writer, Brookings fellow and Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes, had noted the order skipped over a key part of the U.S. code on “inadmissible aliens” which Trump had publicly recited on Wednesday in defense of his immigration restrictions.
The statute reads in part: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
The claim is correct; this is the actual cite: (read it for yourself at the link!)

(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.
The law makes clear that the President has essentially unquestionable authority to restrict entry of immigrants by mere proclamation for any amount of time he or she deems appropriate. There is no provision for that decision to be reviewable by a court; the only redress is political (via impeachment.)  The opinion claims that there is no such thing as “unreviewable” decisions when it comes to constitutionality.  That’s true but intentionally misleading.  The Congress and Constitution delegate certain powers to certain places.  A clear act beyond the delegated power is, of course, reviewable whether it is claimed to be or not.
But in this case the statute has been on the books for decades (the 1950s, to be exact) and has been used in this exact context by a huge number of previous Presidents — including Obama.  In fact when Obama suspended all immigration from Iraq he did so on this exact basis and with this exact statutory authority.  When Jimmy Carter suspended all immigration from Iran he did so on the same basis, with the same authority and did not have to, nor did he even attempt to show that the suspension was due to threats of terrorism.  In fact Carter’s suspension was a purely punitive act aimed at Iran for the actions some of their people took on their own soil.  Yes, those actions were aimed at the United States (the taking of hostages in our embassy) but they took place there, not here. Nonetheless that action was both lawful and constitutional.
The court didn’t even cite the statute that Trump used to issue his executive order.  It instead tried to use a section of the Immigration code that bears on numerical immigration targets which specifies that in that context you may not discriminate on a number of bases — nationality being one of them.  The problem is that Trump’s order doesn’t bear on that section of US Immigration Law at all; it instead relies on the lawful authority of the Executive to suspend immigration from any class of persons when it is, in the opinion of the Executive, in the national interest to do so.  The facts are that Obama took the same action against Iraqi immigrants for the same reason and that the same security concerns have continued to occur since, including a documented incident where two arrests were made early last year.
Folks, you may agree or disagree with the action Trump took.  This Ticker isn’t about that.   It’s about the willful, intentional and unconstitutional acts of the 9th Circuit that continue a long tradition in the US Court system of acting as if controlling law, including the Constitution, does not exist whenever it suits some particular group of people.
Any government body that does such a thing by accident must be called out.  If it was an accident then said body will immediately correct its mistake.
Any government body that does such a thing through evidenced intent must be disbanded and removed from power.  If it is not, when such a means exists (and it certainly does, as the Constitution gives the power to Congress to disband or reorganize any part of the court system; the only Constitutionally-required court is the Supreme Court) then all such co-conspiring components of the government have declared themselves illegitimate.   ~240 years ago our nation went to war over this exact issue and the extraction — otherwise called “theft” — that was taking place upon the citizens as a result.   Today we have the same thing going on but at an even larger scale and with far more injury than was the case 240 years ago.
We have, in this instance, a court that has stated a factual lie as the basis of its deliberation — that no “immigrant” from the named nations has been arrested or linked to terrorism.  That’s a damned and knowing lie; in point of fact there have been many such arrests and most of those arrested have either been convicted or are still awaiting trial.  In fact Obama suspended immigration from one of those nations for this exact reason after we caught immigrants” here plotting an attack.  The judges of the 9th Circus deliberately lied to both the public and arguing counsel prior to issuing their “decision”, and it was upon this lie that their decision was predicated.  As just one example of more than a dozen over the last two years two Iraqi-born individuals who came here as refugees were arrested last year.  I remind you that Iraq is one of the nations on the list.
Trump’s order for the purpose of evaluating the means by which those people got into the country and to take whatever corrective actions are necessary to prevent repeats is not only logical it’s legal under the authority delegated to him by Congress and expressed in US Code. That the 9th Circus deliberately ignored the clear text of that section of law because they didn’t like it and instead selected a section of law that does not bear on the issue is not “interpreting the law”, it is literally blacking out the sections of law they do not like, which is not within their Constitutional power — only Congress can do that through repealing said law.
It is this very same willful and intentional refusal to follow the law that has led to the issues with our health care system.  The law, which not only exists in statute it has been tested at the US Supreme Court says that monopolies and similar acts in restraint of trade are not only unlawful civilly in many cases they are criminal felonies.  This was tested in 1979 when insurance companies tried to claim an exemption under Mccarran-Ferguson, which is also law, and they lost.
That’s supposed to be the end of the discussion until and unless Congress passes something to change the state of said law.  Congress has not done so.
The courts, along with the Executive, however, have refused to enforce said law, just as they have done here with Trump’s order.  The result is that a $40,000 hospital bill comes with a more than $38,000 “discount” if you have a certain kind of “insurance.”  Such a pricing disparity is clear evidence of collusive intent to restrain trade and tie sales unlawfully, that is, to compel you to purchase something you do not want by threatening to bankrupt you if you don’t have it.
That’s illegal folks.
Either the law applies to everyone or it applies to nobody.  If the latter then there is no law that should be respected by anyone.  Do you want to live in such a nation?  You do, right here, right now, today.  You are being financially raped on a daily basis in exactly this fashion.  Those of you on the left cheering for the 9th Circuit order are cheering for your own financial rape, destruction and ultimately your own death at the very hands of those same people.
Health care is simply one aspect of this abuse — yet it is a very large one, spanning close to 20% of our entire economy.  There are others.  “Net neutrality” means that if you don’t want to buy Netflix service you still pay for it in your Internet service because Hastings managed to force carriers to pay the majority of his transport costs.  That’s nice if you want to use Netflix but if you don’t then it’s a tax leveled on you and given to the company!  That’s theft at literal gunpoint.
I can cite literally dozens of additional examples, all of which wind up screwing you.
And while there will be plenty of “I told you sos” if there is a terrorist incident originating from one of these rapefugees the fact of the matter is that the underlying issue is both far more grave and pervasive than whether a few nations have entry of their nationals into the US curtailed until we can verify that the credentials they have actually represent who they are.

The underlying issue is literally the difference between a Constitutional government and a firearm-toting mob that takes whatever it wants, including your life, whenever it wants.


Remember the judge who gave the stop order is a community activist, provoked controversy by saying “black lives matter” from the bench., does Pro-bono legal work for illegal aliens, and he believes the purpose of the courts is to help people who feel disenfranchised. I though the courts we there to judge law and hand down sentences in convictions?

“The rationale for the ban was not only 9/11,” Bennett said. “It was to protect the United States from the potential for terrorism.”

“The court doesn’t get to look behind those determinations,” she added.

But the judge answered: “I’m also asked to look and determine if the executive order is rationally based. And rationally based, to some extent, means I have to find it grounded in fact instead of fiction.”   He apparently did not look to far, the fact that ISIS said they would plant Jihadist among the refugees was publicized, and is now considered fiction according to this judge, to hell with the safety of American citizens, let them come.

Under Title 8, Section 1182 of the U.S. Code, the president has authority to use a proclamation to suspend the entry of “any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States [who] would be detrimental to the interests of the United States,” for however long he deems necessary. This provision was included in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.

President Obama issued a presidential proclamation in 2011 suspending the entry of “any alien who planned, ordered, assisted, aided and abetted, committed or otherwise participated in” war crimes or other violations of humanitarian law. That means the State Department has authority to block someone from getting a visa if they are found ineligible under that criteria.

The executive branch has broad discretion through this authority. In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that the government can deny someone a visa on national security grounds without a specific reason.

“The immigration law was designed to give as much discretionary authority to the executive branch as humanly possible, and to preclude the judicial branch from being able to review those decisions,” said Matthew Kolken, an immigration attorney.


So please tell me where these Progressive judges think President Trump does not have this right to ban travel from these countries? Why I attends the security briefing? I do not beleive it is the judges, they have no idea of the threats facing this nation. Turns out even Bush judicial appointees are in the socialist liberal tank.

Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid to Restore Travel Ban

The U.S. Justice Department’s request to immediately reinstate President Donald Trump’s travel and immigration ban was denied early Sunday. The emergency stay came after a federal judge in Washington state put the executive order on hold nationwide. On Saturday the Department of Homeland Security said it was complying with the judge’s order and halting implementation of the executive order. The order, signed more than a week ago, halts immigration for foreign nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries. In its court filing, the Justice Department said judge James Robart’s decision to block the order “second-guesses the president’s national security judgment about the quantum of risk posed by the admission of certain classes of (non-citizens) and the best means of minimizing that risk.” Trump tweeted about the case multiple times on Saturday, at one point referring to Robart as the “so-called judge.”

John Nelson - jenkan04@gmail.com
Bob Gilmore
Dick Fankhauser