Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies
September 18th, 2020 | 
Author: 
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies
Posted in 
IS KAMALA HARRIS QUALIFIED TO RUN FOR THE VICE PRESIDENCY?
The Vortex — Kamala Family,
Slave Owners
Read the data below and make your own determination were here parents of America citizens when she was born, remember they both came here on student visas which do not grant “permanent residents (LPA)
If not, Kamala Harris is not qualified to run or the presidency or Vice-Presidency, she is a “Naturalized Citizen” Not “Natural Born Citizen” a major difference between the two as explained below. This is all documented data, from Emeril De Vattel’s Law of Nations, The Founders of the U.S Constitution, Rep John Bingham the Framer of the 14th Amendment, and the U. S. Immigration and Naturalization laws of 1952 (The law of the day). Remember this all took place in 1960 through 1964 When Kamala Harris was born.
Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment
1 -Critics claim that anyone born in the United States is automatically a U.S. citizen, even if their parents are here illegally.
2 -Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.
3 -Birthright citizenship has been implemented by executive fiat, not because it is required by federal law or the Constitution.
It is just plain wrong to claim that the children born of parents temporarily in the country as students or tourists are automatically U.S. citizens: They do not meet the 14th Amendment’s jurisdictional allegiance obligations. They are, in fact, subject to the political jurisdiction (and allegiance) of the country of their parents. The same applies to the children of illegal aliens because children born in the United States to foreign citizens are citizens of their parents’ home country.
Federal law offers them no help either. U.S. immigration law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) simply repeats the language of the 14th Amendment, including the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
ORGIN AND HISTORY OF THE TERM “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AND IT’S KNOWN MEANING.
A Natural Born Citizen is a person whose Citizenship is beyond dispute, and not subject to conflicting claims, nor granted by Statute or any Act of a Sovereign, but occurs naturally in the person according to principles that do not rely on the Laws of Decisions of the Sovereign. A Natural Born Citizen is a Citizen by no Act of Law, or Legislation, such as Naturalization. Congress can only Naturalize but cannot determine who is a Natural Born Citizen.
The proper method to determine who qualifies to be a Natural Born Citizen, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, is to examine first the plain words of the Constitution. But Article II of the Constitution only states that the President must be a Natural Born Citizen. It does not define who is a Natural Born Citizen.
If the plain words of the Constitution do not supply an answer, then appropriate legal analysis is to examine the Intent of the Framers and Signors of the US Constitution, as to the meaning of the words, Natural Born Citizen. The Intent can be determined by examining the testimony and writings of the Founders, along with evidence of any legal or philosophical influences on the same Founders or Signors. In addition, one must examine legal cases, especially US Supreme Court Cases that have addressed the issue, along with Congressional records and efforts, regarding the same.
1 – Emer de Vattel The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/vattel-the-law-of-nations-lf-ed
-
Emmerich de Vattel and the Founders and Framers of the United States Constitution, when using the term Natural Law, meant that such Laws are guided by reason and objective facts, and not by tradition or arbitrary human policy. Natural Law is based upon science, reason, and how things are naturally.
-
Under Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, Citizenship is determined by the father, the mother and the nation. Quote of section #212, Chapter 19, Book 1, Law of Nations, by Vattel, written in 1758: “§ 212. Citizens and natives. “The Citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they participate equally in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are Citizens”. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born.
I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
-
Section 213: The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state, while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society, without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity. A nation, or the sovereign who represents it, may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen, by admitting him into the body of the political society. This is called naturalization.
THE FEDERALIST PAPERS REFERENCING ARTICLE II SECTION 1
-
As president of the Continental Congress and as a diplomat during and after the Revolution, Jay developed a healthy distrust of sinister European powers abroad. Jay wrote to George Washington in Philadelphia during the Constitutional Convention: “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
Washington thanked him for his “hint,” but the convention adopted language that was far more elastic. Article II, Section 1, specifies:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
This language not only allowed immigrants such as Jay’s friend Hamilton to run for president, it also made George Washington eligible. Washington and Hamilton had been born British subjects; both became citizens of the United States on July 4, 1776, the day the nation was born. From the New York Packet Friday, March 14, 1788. Author: Alexander HamiltonNatural-Born Citizen Defined
-
One universal point most all early publicists agreed on was natural-born citizen must mean one who is a citizen by no act of law. If a person owes their citizenship to some act of law (naturalization for example), they cannot be considered a natural-born citizen. This leads us to defining natural-born citizen under the laws of nature – laws the founders recognized and embraced. Under the laws of nature, every child born requires no act of law to establish the fact the child inherits through nature his/her father’s citizenship as well as his name (or even his property) through birth. This law of nature is also recognized by law of nations. Howard said the citizenship clause under the Fourteenth Amendment was by virtue of “natural law and national law.”
The advantages of Natural Law is competing allegiances between nations are not claimed, or at least with those nations whose custom is to not make citizens of other countries citizens without their consent. Under Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866) made clear other nation’s citizens would not be claimed: “All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States.” (Does not state “Natural Born Citizens”)
Rep. John A. Bingham commenting on Section 1992 said it means “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866)) (That would mean a citizen of the United States)
Bingham had asserted the same thing in 1862 as well:
Does the gentleman mean that any person, born within the limits of the Republic, and who has offended against no law, can rightfully be exiled from any State or from any rood of the Republic? Does the gentleman undertake to say that here, in the face of the provision in the Constitution, that persons born within the limits of the Republic, of parents who are not the subjects of any other sovereignty, are native-born citizens, whether they be black or white? There is not a textbook referred to in any court which does not recognise the principle that I assert. (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 407 (1862))
Bingham of course was paraphrasing Vattel whom often used the plural word “parents” but made it clear it was the father alone for whom the child inherits his/her citizenship from.
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, James F. Wilson of Iowa, confirmed this in 1866: “We must depend on the general law relating to subjects and citizens recognized by all nations for a definition, and that must lead us to the conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural-born citizen of such States, except that of children born on our soil to temporary sojourners or representatives of foreign Governments.”*
Being in the United States on a Student Visa, makes you a temporary sojourner, you are not a citizen under any definition.
When a child inherits the citizenship of their father, they become a natural-born citizen of the nation their father belongs regardless of where they might be born. It should be pointed out that citizenship through descent of the father was recognized by U.S. Naturalization law whereby children became citizens themselves as soon as their father had become a naturalized citizen, or were born in another country to a citizen father.
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION LAW OF 1952
The data below with exception of the first paragraph, is quoted directly from the 1952 U.S Immigration and Naturalization law currently in affect, and Definitely in affect through the period 1960 through 1964, the period that Kamala Harris’s parent came to the U.S on Student Visa’s and Kamala was born.
One must be a Natural Born Citizen to be the President or Vice President, of the United States of America. There is no difference in the Rights held by a Citizen versus a Natural Born Citizen in the United States, other than that one who is not a Natural Born Citizen cannot be either the President or Vice President of the United States. A Citizen can be a Senator, a Congressperson, a member of the US Supreme Court, or any other forms of Office, but unless that Citizen is a Natural Born Citizen, he cannot be President or Vice President of the United States. The Founders of the Constitution, and those by whom they were influenced, understood the necessity that the President of the new Nation have its unquestioned allegiance.
POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE COMMISSIONER SEC. 103.
(a) The Attorney General shall be charged with the administration and enforcement of this Act and all other laws relating to the immigration and naturalization of aliens, except insofar as this Act or such laws relate to the powers, functions, and duties conferred upon the President, the Secretary of State, the officers of the Department of State, or diplomatic or consular officers: Provided however that determination and ruling by the Attorney General with respect to all questions of law shall be controlling.
ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS OF CERTAIN RESIDENT ALIENS TO NONIMMIGRANT STATUS SEC. 247.
(a) The status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence shall be adjusted by the Attorney General, under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of a nonimmigrant under paragraph (15) (A), (15) (E), or (15) (G) of section 101 (a), if such alien had at the time of entry or subsequently acquires an occupational status which would, if he were seeking admission to the United States, entitle him to a nonimmigrant status under such sections.
REQUIREMENTS AS TO RESIDENCE, GOOD MORAL CHARACTER, ATTACHMENT TO THE PRINCIPLES OF THE CONSTITUTION, AND FAVORABLE DISPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES SEC 816.
(a) No person, except as otherwise provided in this title, shall be naturalized unless such petitioner,
(1) immediately preceding the date of filing his petition for naturalization has resided continuously, after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence, within the United States for at least five years and during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his petition has been physically present therein for periods totaling at least half of that time, and who has resided within the State in which the petitioner filed the petition for at least six months,
(2) has resided continuously within the United States from the date of the petition up to the time of admission to citizenship, and
(3) during all the periods referred to in this subsection has been and still is a person of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States.
PREREQUISITE TO NATURALIZATION; BURDEN OF PROOF SEC. 318. Except as otherwise provided in this title, no person shall be naturalized unless he has been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence in accordance with all applicable pro-visions of this Act. The burden of proof shall be upon such person to show that he entered the United States lawfully, and the time, place, and manner of such entry into the United States, but in presenting; such proof he shall be entitled to the production of his immigrant visa, if any, or of other entry document, if any, and of any other documents and records, not considered by the Attorney General to be confidential, pertaining to such entry, in the custody of the Service.
What is a permanent Resident?
A Permanent Resident card, or “green card,” is a plastic card with the individual’s biographic information, photo, fingerprint, and expiration date issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
It authorizes the green card holder the right to live and work in the United States indefinitely. Because at one time, it was green, it keeps its nickname up to today. It is also known as an “Alien Registration Card” and “Form I-551”. Currently, the card is yellowish with a magnetic barcode on the back which stores the individual’s information.
While the green card has an expiration date (10 years) and has to be renewed, the green card holder’s status as “lawful permanent resident” is still valid unless the status is abandoned or revoked by U.S. government.
A Permanent Resident enjoys most of the rights of a United States citizen according to the immigration law and regulations.
1) To live permanently in the United States provided you do not commit any actions that would make you removable (deportable) under the immigration law (section 237, Immigration and Nationality Act).
2) To be employed in the United States at any legal work of your qualification and choosing.
3) To be protected by all of the laws of the United States, your state of residence and local jurisdictions.
4) To vote in local elections where United States citizenship is not required.
Exceptions
1) Some jobs will be limited to United States citizens because of security concerns
2) You may not vote in elections limited to United States citizens.
In order for a foreign national to live and work in the United States on a permanent basis, s/he must become a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR). LPR status is conferred on those foreign nationals who have received approval to immigrate to the United States. They are given immigrant visas (rather than temporary nonimmigrant visas). Lawful Permanent Residents are provided with an Alien Registration Card (commonly called Green Cards) as proof of their permanent status.
An individual who is a lawful permanent resident is eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship five years after becoming a resident through employment, or three years after acquiring residency through marriage to a U.S. citizen.
To be eligible for naturalization, you must:
1) Be at least 18 years old at the time you submit Form N-400, Application for Naturalization.
2) Be a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder) for at least five years.
3) Demonstrate continuous residence in the United States for at least five years immediately before the date you file Form N-400.
4) Show that you have been physically present in the United States for at least 30 months out of the five years immediately before the date you file Form N- 400.
5) Show that you have lived for at least three months in the state or USCIS district where you apply. Students may apply for naturalization either where they go to school or where their family lives (if they are still financially dependent on their parents).
6) Be a person of good moral character.
7) Demonstrate an attachment to the principles and ideals of the U.S. Constitution.
8) Be able to read, write, and speak basic English.
9) Have a basic understanding of U.S. history and government (civics).
10) Take an oath of allegiance to the United States.
Nonimmigrants are foreign nationals admitted temporarily to the United States within classes of admission that are defined in section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Examples of nonimmigrant classes of admission include foreign government officials, temporary visitors for business and pleasure, aliens in transit, treaty traders and investors, academic and vocational students, temporary workers, exchange visitors, athletes and entertainers, victims of certain crimes, and certain family members of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs).
Unlike people granted LPR, or “green card” status, who may live in the United States essentially without restrictions, nonimmigrants are authorized to enter the country for specific purposes. Nonimmigrants’ duration of stay and lawful activities, such as employment, travel, and accompaniment by dependents, are prescribed by their class of admission.
Key statements regarding naturalization:
1) Preceding the date of filing his petition for naturalization has resided continuously, after being lawfully admitted for permanent residence, within the United States for at least five years.
2) A person who is in legal status (Student Visa still good,) upon completion of studies and graduation, can apply for Permanent residency which is required for five years before applying for Naturalization.
4) Remember the dates; Mother immigrated on Student visa 1960, Father 1961 Kamala Harris born 1964.
5) Natural born is defined as “born of parents or Citizens of the United States” as stated in all documents above including the Happersett Supreme course case.
6) Citizen defined as “born of parents who are not citizens of the United States and owe allegiance to the country of their origin”,
7) Children born to parents on permanent residents (LPA) are dual citizens owing allegiance to the country of the father, but also citizens of the United States.Supreme Court 8) Minor vs Happersett; CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court. Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that ‘no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President” and that Congress shall have power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.’ Thus, new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.
9) The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
-
Is Kamala Harris a Natural Born Citizen or a Naturalized citizen?
TWO OF THE LARGEST EVER FEMA GRANTS TO BE GIVEN TO PUERTO RICO
The White House Office of Public Liaison
|
CURRENT ECONOMIC STATUS COMEBACK UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP
President Trump Built the Greatest Economy in the World and Will Do So Again
- Under President Trump we will return to our unprecedented prosperity.
- Last night 9/17, the President held a Great American Comeback event in Mosinee, Wisconsin.
- He is leading our Great American Comeback and restoring our economy to record heights.
In August:
o 1.4 million jobs were added back to the economy and the unemployment number dropped.
o The women’s unemployment rate decreased 2%.
o The Black unemployment rate dropped 1.6%.
o The Hispanic American unemployment rate dropped 2.4%.
o The Asian American unemployment rate dropped 1.3%
o In the past 4 months, more than 10 million jobs have been added to the economy – nearly half the jobs lost during the global pandemic.
- President Trump’s efforts to protect American workers and businesses during the coronavirus pandemic have clearly worked.
- Operation Warp Speed is closer than ever to delivering a safe and effective coronavirus vaccine which will further help reopen the economy.
o We remain on track to have a safe vaccine before the end of the year.
o The Trump Administration issued a detailed national vaccine distribution plan. The goal is to allow the most vulnerable and highest risk people to be vaccinated in the first group.
- Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are using dangerous rhetoric that undermines the coronavirus vaccine.
Joe Biden would be the worst person to put in charge of the economy just as workers are getting back on their feet. Biden and the Democrats would immediately collapse the economy.
o As Vice President, he presided over the worst recovery since the Great Depression.
o Joe Biden’s economic plan includes a massive $4 TRILLION tax hike on hardworking Americans.
o 82% of families would see their taxes go up under the Biden tax plan.
o Biden voted for the job-killing NAFTA trade agreement which cost the U.S. 850,000 jobs.
o Biden has vowed the “first thing” he would do would be to repeal the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
o Joe Biden would shut the economy down again.
o The Green New Deal would cost the U.S. 10 million jobs.
- When voters are asked “who the American people trust to rebuild the economy,” the answer is overwhelmingly “President Trump.”
- President Trump built the greatest economy in the world and is doing so again. He is the man to continue leading our Great American Comeback.
WHAT’S NEXT 14 & 15 YEAR OLD VOTING?
Some 16- and 17-year-olds might get voting rights after 2020 elections
Who cares, one might ask? Young people, for one. In fact, the movement was started by teenagers protesting guns on high school campuses in 2018, in turn generating the political energy for lowering the voting age, giving them a say. Another group that cares are people concerned about low voter turnout, feeling that could be improved by starting voting earlier in life. Politics, of course, is always part of election reform, and Democrats, who have stronger support among the more liberal young, like letting younger teenagers vote, while Republicans do not.
To understand this movement, you have to start by understanding our constitutional election system. We do not have one nationwide election, even for president, but rather 51 state elections (including the District of Columbia) as established by Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution. Then, cities and counties largely oversee their own elections for local offices. Short of a federal constitutional amendment, which is extremely difficult to enact these days, any change in voting age would be carried out at the state or local level, which is precisely what is underway.
The California ballot initiative, Proposition 18, would allow 17-year-olds to vote in the primary election if they turn 18 by the general election. Although this seems like a limited change, the Public Policy Institute of California recently estimated that in the 2016 and 2018 elections, it would have empowered 200,000 new primary voters, which could have affected the makeup of 33 general election races. Such laws already exist in 10 states and the District of Columbia. Not surprisingly, the California Democratic Party has endorsed the ballot proposition.
Interestingly, the Colorado ballot offers voters a chance to turn away from its law allowing 17-year-olds to vote in the primary. Amendment 76 would effectively strike down a law passed in 2019 allowing 17-year-olds to vote in primaries, saying that 18 is the minimum voting age there. The 2019 law passed without any Republican support, and the question now goes to the people. The cities of San Francisco and Oakland also have ballot propositions for younger voters, and other municipalities around the country allow younger voters in local races.
It’s difficult to find a compelling reason to reduce the voting age. In fact, many laws about the drinking age or the age for driving without supervision have moved in the opposite direction in recent years, in part recognizing that the brain is still developing reasoning capabilities at those ages. Young people below 18 cannot serve on juries, serve in the military without parental permission, or qualify for their own credit card. It’s not as though there is a fairness question on the table as there was in 1971: Should young people have to go to war yet be unable to vote for national leadership?
The only objective argument for allowing 16- and 17-year-olds to vote is that it might increase voter turnout to start the voting habit earlier. This has yet to be proven, and consistently younger voters do not turn out in high percentages. In 2016, for example, only half of eligible younger voters actually voted, compared with two-thirds of older cohorts. A much better proposal is to allow students to preregister to vote in high school but wait until age 18 for the registration to take effect.
If 16- and 17-year-olds voting is the answer, it’s difficult to see what the question is. Without more objective evidence supporting it, it looks a lot like other so-called reforms that are really intended to help one political party over another.
David Davenport is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. He is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution and a visiting scholar with the Orrin G. Hatch Foundation. He is the co-author, with Gordon Lloyd, of How Public Policy Became War.
If Joe Biden says it, that’s good enough for much of the media.
HERE’S CREEPY JOE GETTING CLOSE AND SNIFFING
WITH HANDS ON PERSON
!
Joe Biden won’t admit it, but his proposal
would hike taxes on the middle class
If Joe Biden says it, that’s good enough for much of the media.
So when Biden says he won’t raise taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000, fact-checkers call it “accurate” and reporters buy it.
But reporters shouldn’t buy it. Nobody should buy it, because the promise is belied by his own proposals. Biden’s tax plan will raise taxes on middle-income people who are saving for retirement, while at the same time, restoring some special-interest tax cuts for the wealthy. Here’s Biden’s pledge: “Nobody making under 400,000 bucks would have their taxes raised, period, bingo.”
Sure enough, most of Biden’s proposed tax hikes — limited deductions and higher rates, for example — apply only to those earning $400,000 or more.
But Biden’s proposed change to 401(k) plans will hike taxes on the middle class. If you’re a single earner earning the median household income, Biden’s plan would give you a $1,000 tax hike, and mostly (but not fully) offset that tax hike with a government contribution to your retirement account.
Here’s how it would happen:
Under current law, income you put in your 401(k) retirement account today doesn’t get taxed until you can actually touch it— which is at retirement, at 59 and a half years old. It’s not a tax deduction like the deductions you get for health insurance and mortgage interest, as much as it’s a tax deferral. You will pay taxes on that income, but not until you get your hands on it and can spend it. If you earn $62,400, which is close to the median household income in the United States, and you take the standard deduction ($12,400), leaving your taxable income at $50,000, and your federal income tax burden would be $8,963. (We’re simplifying this by removing other deductions and taxes.)
But say you want to save $5,000 a year for retirement. Then you get your employer to sock away $5,000 in your 401(k), which reduces your taxable income to $45,000, and thus reduces your taxes to $7,863 — down from $8,963. That $1,100 tax savings is equal to your $5,000 contribution multiplied by your 22% marginal tax rate. Because of that tax savings of $1,100, you reduced your take-home money by only $3,900 in order to increase your retirement account by $5,000 — but remember, you’ll pay taxes on that $5,000, and all its earnings, once you cash it out in retirement.
Biden would tax you on that $5,000 you socked away, even though you don’t get to spend it, and even though he will tax you on it again when you cash out in retirement. To make up for it, Biden would have Uncle Sam make a contribution to your 401(k). So if Biden were elected, and our $62,400-earner wanted $5,000 in his account, he could reduce his contribution to $3,968, and Biden would match 26% of that ($1,032), bringing the total contribution to $5,000. Our taxpayer would get zero tax break, a net $1,100 tax hike compared to current law, but would instead get a $1,032 gift from Uncle Sam in the form of a retirement contribution. So if you want to count the $1,032 as a tax credit (which is what Biden calls it), offsetting the $1,100 tax hike, it nets out to a small tax hike, but it’s a tax hike.
Your retirement account gets the same amount of money, you take home a little bit less money, and Uncle Sam takes home a tiny bit more money.
If you go up to a $100,000 earner trying to contribute 10%, whose taxes Biden promises not to hike, the tax hike would be bigger (about $335 less in take-home pay) because he’s in the 24% tax bracket. Someone earning $350,000 is very high income, but Biden still swears this guy won’t get a tax hike under his plan. If we take his plan seriously, though, that earner making sure $10,000 goes into his 401(k) a year will see a $3,500 tax hike and a retirement subsidy of less than $2,100 — decreasing his take-home pay $1,400.
Now this differential, a larger tax hike for higher-income people, is exactly what Biden is aiming for with this 401(k) plan. The current system provides more incentive for people to save for retirement as their income grows because excluding income from current-year taxation becomes more valuable, the higher your tax bracket. Biden’s plan would increase the incentive of lower earners to contribute and decrease the incentive of higher earners.
Maybe you agree with Biden that middle-class people and above should get a tax hike for saving for retirement in order to subsidize retirement savings by lower earners, but this is still a proposed tax hike on middle-income people. So how do Biden’s people, and likewise the reporters and fact-checkers agreeing with Biden’s people, see a policy that would increase taxes on a middle-class worker and say it wouldn’t increase taxes on a middle-class worker? They just say that they’ll make sure it doesn’t increase taxes on a middle-class worker.
Check out how the campaign replied to Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler:
-
“A proposal to shift some of the benefits of tax deferral in traditional retirement accounts toward lower- and middle-income earners could reduce the benefits for people earning above $80,250, but under $400,000. ‘In our retirement proposal, we would hold harmless those below $400,000,’ the Biden adviser said.”
Oh! If Biden’s campaign says it, it must be so!
NOT LOOKING GOOD FOR THE SENATE!
The Senate picture looks really, really bad for Republicans
The Republican incumbent senator is trailing by a large margin in two different polls that came out today. It’s dire, and unless things turn around, Republicans will definitely lose the Senate this fall.
Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner trails John Hickenlooper, the former governor and former Denver mayor, by a 52% to 42% margin in the latest poll by Global Strategy Group.
In North Carolina, a Survey USA poll showed Sen. Thom Tillis trailing Democratic challenger Cal Cunnigham 47% to 40%. Tillis hasn’t led Cunningham in a poll since June, according to the RealClearPolitics collection of polls, and he’s surpassed 45% in a head-to-head poll against Cunningham only once this cycle.
Martha McSally in Arizona was trailing challenger Mark Kelly by 5 points and 7 points in two polls released in the past three days.
Susan Collins was trailing by 1 point in two different Maine polls that came out last week and notably was well below 50% in both. David Perdue was slightly down in Georgia. Joni Ernst is tied in Iowa, also well below 50%.
In short, Republicans, who have a 3-seat cushion in their majority, are playing defense in 10 races, and definitively trailing in three of those 10. At most, Democrats are playing defense in four races, and they are not behind in any of them.
A Democratic gain of eight seats or more would not be shocking at all. A Democratic gain of four seats, and thus the majority, seems more like\ than not.
That means that if Trump wins, he will probably not be able to place any justices on the Supreme Court, and almost all of his other federal judicial nominees will be blocked. This will leave massive court vacancies for the next president.
A Democratic takeover of the Senate would have an even bigger effect if Biden wins. Democrats are nearly guaranteed to hold the House, and so a Biden win would probably mean complete Democratic control. So even if Democrats don’t do what they tend to do, and chip away at minority rights, they could hike your taxes, fill judicial vacancies, and who knows what else.
YOU REALLY NEED TO LISTEN TO THE LARRY ELDER PART !
Candace Owens and Larry Elder both discuss what blexit means to them.
What is the right way forward for black America? Find out with these two prolific speakers!
THE HERITAGE INSIDER – The revolution is upon us|America’s messy voter rolls|How the 2nd Amendment saves Americans
September 12, 2020
In today’s edition of The Heritage Insider, we explain the “woke” revolution hitting American streets. Then we cover the problems with America’s voter rolls. Finally, cover the numerous instances of Americans using their right to bear arms to defend themselves.
The left is leveraging tragedy to push their radical agenda. Michael Gonzalez writes:
Hard-left progressives are telling anybody who will listen that the 2020 riots and pandemic have handed them the opportunity they’ve always needed to transform America. What they want is a revolution “in the minds of the people,” not unlike the one John Adams said led to 1776, though to attain opposite ends. The question is, will Americans from the right and center listen, grasp that progressives mean what they say, and realize that the country might change into something unrecognizable?
The warnings (or threats) are everywhere and difficult to miss. They come neatly folded into a very instructive conversation held in August by four charter members of the hard left—Alicia Garza, founder of Black Lives Matter; Nikole Hannah-Jones, founder of the New York Times’ 1619 Project; Maria Teresa Kumar, President and CEO of Voto Latino; and historian Martha Jones. The conversation was held to mark the anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which told the states they could not prevent women from voting.
The exchange was eerily instructive. One almost gets the sense of what it must have been to eavesdrop on the Founders at 1776 or the Framers at 1787, as they envisioned a new order replacing a passing one. Except in reverse, of course—all the gains in human freedom achieved through the Declaration and the Constitution would unravel if the four discussants got their way.
[Michael Gonzalez, “The Revolution Is Upon Us,” Law & Liberty, September 4]
Legal group finds thousands of double voters around the country. Rowan Scarborough writes: A legal foundation has filed two court briefs that assert that double voting by the thousands happened in 2016-2018 in Georgia and North Carolina, as the nation prepares for its first large-scale, mail-in balloting to elect a president.
Anti-universal mail ballot activists say the two states are a tip-off for what will happen in the Nov. 3 election.
Liberal journalists demand that the Trump administration, which opposes mass-mailed ballots in most states, provide evidence of fraud. The counterargument is that it is difficult to cite such examples when only a handful of states before 2020 adopted remote voting. Those unique balloting procedures painstakingly took years to perfect the checks and balances needed to avoid doubling voting. Today, because of the coronavirus pandemic, 22 states are fast-tracking the shift from in-person voting and toward the U.S. Postal Service, according to Ballotpedia.
[Rowan Scarborough, “Legal Group Finds Thousands of Double Voters in Battleground States,” The Washington Times, September 6]
Here are examples of why the right to bear arms is so essential. Amy Swearer writes: Every day, untold numbers of Americans rely on their Second Amendment rights to protect their lives and livelihoods.
According to a 2013 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, almost every major study on the issue has found that Americans use their firearms in self-defense between 500,000 and 3 million times a year. There’s good reason to believe that most of these defensive gun uses aren’t reported to police, much less make the local or national news. For this reason, The Daily Signal each month publishes an article highlighting some of the previous month’s many news stories on defensive gun use that you may have missed—or that might not have made it to the national spotlight in the first place. (Read accounts from 2019 and so far in 2020 here.)
The examples below represent only a small portion of the news stories on defensive gun use that we found in August. You may explore more examples by using The Heritage Foundation’s interactive Defensive Gun Use Database.
[Amy Swearer, “These 10 Examples of Defensive Gun Use Underscore Second Amendment’s True Purpose,” The Daily Signal, September 10]
The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(800) 546-2843
EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS MOVIE! Joe Biden is a threat to this nation, he adores China – they will do anything to get him in office!
RIDING THE DRAGON: THE BIDENS’
CHINESE SECRETS (FULL DOCUMENTARY)
‘Riding the Dragon: The Bidens’ Chinese Secrets’ is a well-produced documentary based on the research of ‘Clinton Cash’ author, Peter Schweizer for his latest book, ‘Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends.’ Schweizer narrates the largely untold story of how Joe Biden enriched his family by using his influence as Vice President to help them make lucrative deals with Communist China, including the Chinese military.
Joe Biden’s two brothers, his sister and his son had all been landing sweet insider business deals as consultants, contractors and lobbyists for much of Joe’s 35-year tenure as Delaware Senator before he ascended to the Vice Presidency in 2009. Afterwards, they kicked it up several notches. Similarly to how Hunter Biden landed a $1,000,000 per year job on the board of Burisma when his father was made the point man in Ukraine and despite the fact that he had virtually no business experience, let alone in Ukraine or in the gas industry, Hunter landed a one billion dollar deal with the Chinese government 10 days after he joined his father on a state visit to that country.
Peter narrates, “Hunter and his Chinese partners established a private investment fund they would call Bohai Harvest. The Chinese government provided the money, Hunter was given a seat on the Bohai Harvest board of directors and a 10 equity stake in the new company. “Devin Archer, his business partner was appointed Vice Chairman the new firm enjoyed an unusual and special status in China, operating through the Shanghai Free Trade Zone. No other investment fund in the world had a deal like Biden’s firm, not UBS, not Goldman-Sachs, not Morgan Stanley, no one.
“In short, the son of the Vice President of the United States, with little investment experience, no experience in China got a deal in the People’s Republic of China that no one else had and he got that deal shortly after his father was appointed point person on US policy towards China. “But this isn’t just another story about a politician’s kid getting rich. Hunter’s new firm, Bohai Harvest began making investment deals around the world that would serve the strategic interests of the Chinese government – and that’s what makes this deal so troubling.
“That’s a bold thing to say but it’s true. This new firm started making investment deals that would serve the strategic interests of the Chinese military.
“In 2015, Hunter Biden’s Bohai Harvest joined forces with the Chinese military contractor, AVIC (Aviation Industry Corporation of China) to buy American parts manufacturer, Henniges. “Henniges’s technology is considered dual-use, meaning it can be used for commercial and military purposes. Deals like these require approval of the highest levels of the Federal Government.
“Hunter Biden’s partner in the Henniges deal, the Chinese aviation giant, AVIC was notorious for its history of stealing us military technologies to build their own fighter jets and drones but in September 2015, AVIC bought 51% of Henniges and Hunter Biden’s Bohai Harvest bought the other 49% – and yes, the Obama Administration did indeed approve it.”
There’s a LOT more! Don’t miss this important film!
HABITUAL LIAR SCHIFF IS AT IT AGAIN ANOTHER INVESTIGATION TO GET TRUMP.
Schiff’s Obsession With President Trump Is
Dangerous To U.S. National Security
It’s another witch hunt and Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Adam Schiff doesn’t mind wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on it like he has over the past four years. The important aspect of this whole upside down scenario is that Schiff doesn’t really care about the national security issues that could potentially pose a significant danger to the United States or its citizens. He cares about one thing and one thing only: President Donald Trump.
Schiff like Ahab is willing to lose almost anything to get Trump and in the end he just might allow the political whale to drag him to the depths of Washington D.C.’s swamp.
It is a tale often told in many novels and Schiff just happens to be that character. That Character. But we shouldn’t let him drag American taxpayer dollars and security down with him. Schiff has repeatedly lied about Trump and lied to the American people about the so-called evidence he had regarding the now-debunked Russia conspiracy.
Schiff, however, has never been held accountable for the numerous hoaxes he has perpetrated from the committee charged with oversight of our nation’s secrets, covert agencies and the overall security of the country from enemy states. Those enemy states include China, Russia, among many other nations that are using the chaos and divisions in our nation to their benefit. I remember this May, when the House released 57 transcripts of interviews with former senior Obama officials and FBI regarding Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election and the bureau’s investigation into Trump?
Lawmakers began the probe into the FBI’s handling of the investigation into the Trump campaign in January 2017. At the time, the House Committee on Intelligence was Chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes, and he worked diligently with investigators to uncover massive amounts of evidence that revealed malfeasance in the FBI, led to the firing of senior bureau officials and then was reinforced by investigations conducted by the DOJ’s Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Horowitz was not a Trump appointee but was appointed under President Obama.
Throughout all those years and despite numerous findings showing there was no collusion between Trump and Russia, including a final March, 2018 report, it didn’t matter.
Schiff continued to promise the American people that he had evidence proving the opposite.
In 2019, even after investigations cleared Trump, Schiff continued to lie to the American people. He said on ABC News at the time that there was evidence Trump conspired with Russia, saying there was “ample evidence of collusion in plain sight.” “The obstruction of justice in particular in this case is far worse than anything that Richard Nixon did,” Schiff said. “I would say in every way this is more significant than Watergate…And the fact that a candidate for president and now president of the United States would not only not stand up and resist Russian interference in our election but would welcome it goes well beyond anything Nixon did.“
Even though the March 2018 report found no evidence the Trump campaign conspired with Moscow, Schiff refused to allow those transcripts to go public until the White House threatened to release them first. When that died down Schiff shifted to the Ukraine conspiracy, throwing his alleged whistleblowers into the spotlight, like Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman who used his position, along with others at the National Security Counsel to spy on Trump’s phone calls. Those classified phone calls, particularly the one with the Ukraine president, became the focal point of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s, and Schiff’s impeachment parade against Trump.
It rightfully failed and the Senate exonerated Trump but it tore the nation even further apart.
Moreover, millions of taxpayer dollars and time have been wasted by Schiff and his committee, which should be focused on real enemy states, actors and important oversight duties.
Schiff, like many Democrats and never-Trumpers, hates Trump more than they love America.
This new whistleblower is allegedly connected reporting all of his concerns to Schiff about issues with the Department of Homeland Security. He alleges that a reprisal complaint lists “serious wrongdoing” and an effort to hide reports about Russian interference into U.S. elections.
Once again, Russia, Russia, Russia.
“The whistleblower retaliation complaint filed by former Acting Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis Brian Murphy outlines grave and disturbing allegations that senior White House and Department of Homeland Security officials improperly sought to politicize, manipulate, and censor intelligence in order to benefit President Trump politically,” Schiff said in a letter to Brian Murphy’s attorney. “This puts our nation and its security at grave risk.” Really Schiff? A whistleblowers politicized allegations is putting our nation at risk? Our nation is at risk because you, along with your cronies in the Democratic party, have failed to do anything for the American people beyond your one-track Trump mind.
Think about it – beyond Trump. – has Schiff done anything that sticks out? Have there been any revelations that have shown his leadership in the Committee has been exemplary and that he’s doing the best for the American people? What about COVID-19 “China’s virus” and how China, not Trump, failed the nation. What about Russia’s real interference in the 2016 election by leaking disinformation to former British spy Christopher Steele, who was using DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign funds to pay for his Russian sources. I think that’s something that we should look into.
What about the numerous lied that former CIA Director John Brennan, along with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Congress?
What about the current state of Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other extremists groups that are still targeting the United States?
What about Schiff’s own lies? Will Schiff ever actually be held accountable for those lies and for the wasted tax dollars spent chasing unicorns around the D.C. swamp to target Trump?
I doubt it. But remember what kind of person Schiff really is and realize it won’t be long before Schiff sinks his own ship.
Share:
End Of The American Dream – Life As You Have Known It Will Never Be The Same Again…
All Of The Bad News In 2020 Is Causing
A Shockingly High Number Of Americans
To “Seriously Consider” Suicide
This is a very difficult article for me to write, but I definitely need to write it. All over the country, people are considering suicide because of all the bad things that have happened this year, and things are only going to get even more challenging in 2021 and beyond. This greatly grieves me, because suicide is never the answer to anything, and I wish that I could sit down individually with every person that is considering suicide and get them to understand this. Our lives are meant to be lived with purpose, passion and great joy, and that doesn’t change when times get very difficult. In fact, when challenging times come that is when bright lights are needed the most.
Personally, even though I am constantly writing about all of the hard things that are going on in the world, I am not down, I am not depressed, and I am not on any pills. Instead, I am incredibly thankful for the gift of each new day, and there is no other time in all of human history that I would rather be living than right now.
But if you allow your life to be defined by the system that the global elite have established, and if you are living for what you can get from that system, then the years ahead are going to be exceedingly difficult for you because that system is failing.
Over the course of this year, the entire world has been thrown into a state of chaos by the coronavirus pandemic, the global economic collapse and the tremendous civil unrest that we have witnessed in major cities all over the planet. According to a survey that the CDC recently conducted, all of this turmoil has had a dramatic affect on our mental health…
At the end of June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveyed almost 10,000 Americans on their mental health. They found symptoms of anxiety and depression were up sharply across the board between March and June, compared with the same time the previous year. And young people seemed to be the hardest-hit of any group.
Almost 11 percent of all respondents to that survey said they had “seriously considered” suicide in the past 30 days. For those ages 18 to 24, the number was 1 in 4 — more than twice as high.
Those numbers are absolutely heartbreaking.
The years between 18 and 24 should be some of the greatest years of your entire life, and yet one out of every four Americans in that age group “seriously considered” committing suicide in just one month. That number alone is sufficient evidence to prove that our society has become a complete and utter failure. The system that we are living in doesn’t give these young people any real meaning for their lives, it doesn’t provide them with hope, and it doesn’t give them any reason to be optimistic about the long-term future.
And the truth is that suicides have been on the rise for many years. In fact, CDC numbers show that the suicide rate has been increasing “every year since 2007”…
The suicide rate among young people was already at a record high before the pandemic, and had increased every year since 2007, according to a new analysis of CDC data released on Thursday by the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety. The new report, which came on World Suicide Prevention Day, notes that suicide was the second leading cause of death among young people after accidents.
Shouldn’t the fact that the suicide rate just keeps going up year after year after year be a giant red flag for all of us?
As a society, the direction that we are running is the exact opposite of where we should be going, and that greatly frustrates me. Many of us keep sounding the alarm, but most people simply do not want to listen. But if we keep going down the same path, many more Americans will fall into despair, depression and self-destructive behaviors. Just like the CDC numbers that I discussed earlier, a recent KFF tracking poll found that Americans have had an exceedingly difficult time dealing with the events of this year…
In a KFF Tracking Poll conducted in mid-July, 53% of adults in the United States reported that their mental health has been negatively impacted due to worry and stress over the coronavirus. This is significantly higher than the 32% reported in March, the first time this question was included in KFF polling. Many adults are also reporting specific negative impacts on their mental health and wellbeing, such as difficulty sleeping (36%) or eating (32%), increases in alcohol consumption or substance use (12%), and worsening chronic conditions (12%), due to worry and stress over the coronavirus. As the pandemic wears on, ongoing and necessary public health measures expose many people to experiencing situations linked to poor mental health outcomes, such as isolation and job loss.
If we can’t even deal with the problems that we are facing right now, how in the world are we going to handle what else is ahead?
Sadly, our overall mental health was already in really bad shape coming into this year. In 2019, it was being reported that “deaths of despair” in the United States had reached an all-time record high. The following comes from NBC News… Rates of deaths from suicides, drug overdoses and alcohol have reached an all-time high in the United States, but some states have been hit far harder than others, according to a report released Wednesday by the Commonwealth Fund.
When things get really crazy, it can be very tempting to try to find a way to escape. For some people, escaping means abusing alcohol or drugs, and for others it means becoming immersed in endless hours of self-destructive forms of entertainment. And of course some people attempt to “escape” permanently by committing suicide.
But the truth is that you cannot run away from reality, and there is no reason to try to escape in the first place. You were born at this particular moment in history for a reason, there is a unique purpose for your life, and you have a job to do. All of human history has been building up to a great crescendo, and to be alive during this time is such an amazing privilege.
In the movie Gladiator, Russell Crowe’s character made a statement that has always stuck with me. He said that “what we do in life echoes in eternity”.
If you make your life all about the global elite’s system and what you can get from it, you will end up depressed and defeated. But if you focus on the things that will echo in eternity, and if you discover the reason why you were placed at this moment in history, then you will never have any reason to want to try to escape this amazing adventure that we call life.
***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.***
About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com. By purchasing the book you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe. I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article. In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End, Get Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned) The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help. During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.
COMMUNIST REVOLUTION DOESN’T CARE ABOUT ELECTIONS
Guest Post: A Retired CIA Ops Officer Warns; The Left’s Communist Revolution Doesn’t Care About Elections |
|
Guest Post: A Retired CIA Ops Officer Warns; The Left’s Communist Revolution Doesn’t Care About Elections This is a Guest Post. Guest Posts do not necessarily represent the official editorial position of Revolver News. Kenosha, Wisconsin has been ravaged. Minneapolis has been burned. Black Lives Matter and Antifa continue to tear the heart out of once-great cities like Portland. A siege of the White House is being planned. Nationwide, violence has moved into suburban areas and residential neighborhoods. Groups of extremists are specifically targeting the residences of mayors, chiefs of police and other political enemies. The establishment press continues to peddle the notion that what we are seeing across the nation is nothing more than “peaceful protest” designed to achieve change within the existing system. No doubt, even many people in the streets believe this. They think they are marching for more “humane” police forces, or reduced incarceration, or a few new social programs. They believe that, when the protests and riots are over, they will still live in the United States that they knew before, but it will just be a slightly better nation. Of course, people harbored the same delusions in 1959 Cuba and 1917 Russia. Even the foot soldiers of those revolutions likely believed they would still have the countries they grew up in, just with a brighter, more democratic future. They discovered far too late that at the heart of the movement in which they were caught up were hard men with very different ideas about the future. Refuse Fascism is one of the primary umbrella organizations supporting Antifa demonstrations nationwide. Refuse Fascism is a creation of the Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States. If you watch footage of the chaos in our streets, you will quickly see signs linked to both groups. The leader of the so-called RevComs is Bob Avakian. Avakian is a lifelong revoutionary, who spent his youth with Students for a Democratic Society, a domestic extremist group active in the 1960’s and 1970’s. In 2016 Avakian’s RevComs and other leftist groups formed Refuse Fascism. Avakian is remarkably direct about about the goals of this movement. “Let’s get down to basics. We need a revolution. Anything else, in the final analysis, is bullshit,” he said recently. Avakian’s party is no less direct. It has published a proposed constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, which it hopes to establish. Some excerpts from it read as follows: “The New Socialist Republic in North America is…a form of dictatorship – the dictatorship of the proletariat…” “In accordance with this, the governing bodies and processes of this socialist state, at all levels, must be vehicles for the furtherance of the communist revolution…” “The armed forces, militia and other organs of public defense and security shall be under a system of overall leadership combining the central Executive Council and the Revolutionary Communist Party, with the Party having the ultimate leadership responsibility and role.” “The responsibility for the enforcement of the laws and the defense of the Constitution by the organs of public security resides with the Executive Council, with the overall and ultimate leadership of the Revolutionary Communist Party.” [RevCom.us] Behind the RevComs, Refuse Fascism and their allied organizations is a fundraising and financing apparatus that has been building inside this nation for decades. For instance, Refuse Fascism is partially funded by an organization called the Alliance for Global Justice. The Alliance for Global Justice originated in an organization called the Nicaragua Network, a group created to support the Marxist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua. The founders of the Alliance are both veterans of that effort and have strong ties to the Sandinistas. One of them, Chuck Kaufman, was also one of the founders of a group called A.N.S.W.E.R., an organization focused on ending U.S. “threats” against North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba and an end to the “colonial-style occupation in Palestine and in Haiti”. The Alliance for Global Justice, in turn, receives funding from a wide range of organizations. One of them is the Tides Foundation. You may have never heard the group, but its power is vast: It annual spending is measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Tides is generally credited with having pioneered anonymous “Dark Money” transactions for leftist organizations. “Structural racism” is a common theme in many Tides Foundation projects, as is the concept of “white privilege”. The groups sponsoring the 2020 rioters are hostile to the United States of America as it currently exists. They have long since made common cause with some of our most dangerous enemies. Now, what they want is not reform. Phrases like “Black Lives Matter” are a deliberate obfuscation, a time-honored tactic of radical left groups, used to make themselves and their goals seem less threatening. What these extremist groups really want is something much more profound. It is, as one leftist speaker recently put it, the “abolition” of the United States as we know it and its replacement with a Marxist state. That is why it is profoundly delusional to believe the riots of the past three months will end with the November election. They will not. Should President Trump win, his victory will immediately be declared invalid and illegitimate by the mob, and the level of violence will explode. If Biden wins, the people and groups tearing this nation apart will consider him their puppet and will accelerate their efforts at revolution. If Biden proves unwilling or unable to accommodate them, he will suffer the same fate as Portland mayor Ted Wheeler, who endures antifa harassment of his home as the price of failing to submit. This is not about reform. It is about revolution, and revolutions don’t care about elections. |
Lee Greenwood, US soldiers release new version of ‘God Bless the USA’
GOD BLESS THE USA: Lee Greenwood,
in collaboration with The United States
Air Force Band, Singing Sergeants and
Home Free, released a new version of
his hit song “God Bless the U.S.A.” #FoxNews
Released July 5, 2020
THIS SHOULD MAKE IT CLEAR FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT SOCIALISM IS —
DEMOCRATS STAND FOR SOCIALISM
A man named Tom Nicholson posted on his Facebook account
the sports car that he had just bought and how a man approached
and told him that the money used to buy this car could’ve fed
thousands of less fortunate people.
His response to this man made him famous on the internet.
READ his story as stated on Facebook below:
A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said,
“I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car cost?
I replied I’m not sure;
it fed a lot of families in Bowling Green, Kentucky who built it,
it fed the people who make the tires,
it fed the people who made the components that went into it,
it fed the people in the copper mine who mined the copper for the wires,
it fed people in at Caterpillar who make the trucks that haul the copper ore.
It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer
and fed the people working at the dealership and their families.
BUT,… I have to admit, I guess I really don’t know how many people it fed.
That is the difference between capitalism and the welfare mentality.
When you buy something, you put money in people’s pockets and give them dignity for their skills.
When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self-worth.
Capitalism is freely giving your money in exchange for something of value.
Socialism is having the government take your money against your will and give it to someone else for doing nothing.
I think this is well written and well thought out
If you agree please send it to your friends.
If you don’t agree just delete it and have a nice day.
THIS IS GREAT INGENUITY, THE LEFT DESTROYS, AND THESE GUY CONSERVATIVES ALL BUILD IT UP -GREAT JOB! DEMOCRATS CAN’T FACE THE TRUTH!
In Polk County, FL conservative Republicans have placed more than
8,000 Trump yard signs and constructed 90 – 4′ X 8″ Trump Billboards
on private property. Many of the yard signs have been stolen and so
far 6 Billboards have been vandalized by leftist Democrats who can’t
stand us for demonstrating our 1st Amendment rights. None of the
very few Biden signs around have been touched.
construction “crew” from the Lake Ashton Republican Club fight back.
